The New Yorker / Kyle Chayka
Bluesky’s quest to build nontoxic social media →“Graber, who defines her politics as ‘anti-authoritarian,’ sees Bluesky as a corrective to prevailing social media that subjects users to the whims of billionaires. ‘Elon, if he wanted to, could just delete the whole X time line—just do these totally arbitrary things,’ she said, adding, ‘I think this self-styled tech-monarch thing is worth questioning. Do we want to live in that world?'”
Bloomberg / Davey Alba and Julia Love
Google AI search shift leaves website makers feeling “betrayed” →“[Behind closed doors] Google representatives apologized to the web creators and said their sites represented exactly the kind of helpful content that the company wanted to surface in search, according to creators who were in attendance. But Googlers also said they couldn’t give any guarantees that their websites would recover, because the search product had fundamentally changed in the AI era, multiple attendees said.”
Press Gazette / Rob Waugh
Los Angeles Times / Stephen Battaglio
Broadcast television is in trouble. Stations are asking Washington for help →“Now, the companies are calling on the Federal Communications Commission, chaired by President Trump appointee Brendan Carr, to lift ownership caps that currently limit them to owning two TV outlets in a single market. The total number of stations owned by one company can cover no more than 39% of the U.S., which was last revised upward in the pre-steaming era of 2004.”
NBC News / Caroline Radnofsky
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
The New York Times / Lauren Hirsch and Benjamin Mullin
Trump and Paramount agree on mediator in “60 Minutes” lawsuit →“A deal would be a remarkable concession by a major U.S. media company to a politician, especially in a case in which there is no evidence that the network got facts wrong or damaged the plaintiff’s reputation. Mr. Trump claims that ’60 Minutes’ deceptively edited an interview last fall with former Vice President Kamala Harris, his opponent in the presidential election campaign. The network says the editing is protected by the First Amendment.”
The Wall Street Journal / Jack Pitcher and Isabella Simonetti
The false tariff headline that sent stocks on a $2 trillion ride →“The origin of the report remains unclear. The headline was circulating on social media by 10:13 a.m., when a widely followed X account known as Walter Bloomberg posted it. That anonymous account has for years posted trading-related news throughout the market day, often in the form of all-caps newswire headlines copy-and-pasted from the Bloomberg Terminal. The account, which has nearly one million followers, isn’t associated with Bloomberg News. The Walter Bloomberg account and others like it are popular with market watchers who don’t have access to Bloomberg’s expensive news-and-data terminals.”
The New Yorker / Joshua Rothman
Will A.I. save the news? →“The news, for the most part, follows events forward in time. Each day—or every few hours—newly published stories track what’s happened. The problem with this approach is presentism. In reporting on the
dismantling of the federal agency U.S.A.I.D., for instance, news organizations weren’t able to dedicate much space to discussing the agency’s history. But A.I. systems are biased toward the past—they are smart only because they’ve learned from what’s already been written—and they move easily among related ideas.”