Podcast on Barry Friedman’s new book, ‘Unwarranted’; Five 9th Circuit judges dissent, arguing for vacating panel decision on President Trump’s immigration executive order; ‘A, B or C’ vs. ‘A, B, or C’ — the serial comma and the law; This law school ranking system is much better than U.S. News; N.Y. bill would require people to remove ‘inaccurate,’ ‘irrelevant,’ ‘inadequate’ or ‘excessive’ statements about others;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
Podcast on Barry Friedman’s new book, ‘Unwarranted’
Barry Friedman and I discuss his new book on the Fourth Amendment.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Five 9th Circuit judges dissent, arguing for vacating panel decision on President Trump’s immigration executive order
"The combination of [Kleindienst v. Mandel, Fiallo v. Bell, and Kerry v. Din], and the history of their application to the post-9/11 registration program, is devastating to the panel’s conclusion that we can simply apply ordinary constitutional standards to immigration policy."
‘A, B or C’ vs. ‘A, B, or C’ — the serial comma and the law
"For want of a comma, we have this case" about Maine's overtime law.
 
This law school ranking system is much better than U.S. News
A new paper ranks law schools by student revealed preferences.
 
N.Y. bill would require people to remove ‘inaccurate,’ ‘irrelevant,’ ‘inadequate’ or ‘excessive’ statements about others
Speakers would have to delete speech that -- however factually correct -- might be found by a court to be "no longer material to current public debate or discourse."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2017 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071