In an opinion editorial, Robert Hall discusses the division within the Bitcoin community between the "Bitcoin transaction maximalists" and the "Ordinal enjoooyers." The transaction maximalists believe that Bitcoin Layer 1 should focus solely on processing transactions, while the enjoooyers want to experiment with inscribing arbitrary data on Bitcoin's base layer. Hall acknowledges that both sides have valid arguments but raises concerns about the infighting and its potential negative impact on the Bitcoin movement.
Hall expresses sympathy for the transaction maximalists' viewpoint, as higher transaction fees can disproportionately affect users in the global south who rely on Bitcoin for day-to-day transactions. However, he also recognizes that Ordinals, which allow for NFTs on Bitcoin, have brought new developers and increased activity to the network, demonstrating the potential for fees to replace the block subsidy over time.
The tension between the two camps has led to a division within the Bitcoin community, which Hall finds disheartening. He believes that the community should be united in the mission of adopting a Bitcoin standard worldwide and emphasizes the need to present a united front to the public. Hall criticizes the infighting seen on Bitcoin Twitter and at the Bitcoin 2023 conference, suggesting that such behavior undermines the industry's credibility and readiness for wider adoption.
Hall concludes by urging the community to stay focused, presentable, and united in their goal of offering a better alternative to the current financial system. He calls for putting aside differences, abandoning symbolic gestures like wizard hats and laser eyes, and remembering the principles that brought people to Bitcoin in the first place. |