The future of agricultural gene editing: More herbicide-tolerant crops sooner

The future of agricultural gene editing: More herbicide-tolerant crops sooner

A new paper from Chinese scientists spells out the future of agricultural gene editing. In spite of claims from GMO promoters that gene editing will save us from climate change and reduce pesticide use, the paper tells us that what we can expect is just more of the same – GM herbicide-tolerant crops, this time produced with gene editing. This will continue the trajectory of increased herbicide use resulting from the spread of GM herbicide-tolerant crops.
But there are crucial differences with gene-edited crops, as the paper makes clear. The fact that some governments have deregulated gene editing means that regulatory risk assessment won't be involved in those countries, making gene-edited GMOs faster to develop, more profitable, and potentially more hidden from consumers.
Following are excerpts from the paper, which is titled "Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing".
No risk assessment means earlier commercialisation and bigger profits
The authors write: "Base editing offers multiple amino acids substitution of targeted genes that confers resistance to multiple herbicides. Notably, unlike GM plants, the non-transgenic plants produced via CRISPR-Cas system are free from any additional regulatory approval (exempted from regulation) in several countries. Therefore, genome editing can expedite the commercialization of HR crops. Compared to mutagenesis and GM approach, genome editing can save the time and cost of HR development. As the genome-edited HR crops generated without the introduction of foreign DNA do not require risk assessment, this allows developers to launch new crops into the market years earlier and for millions of dollars less than GM crops" (emphasis added).
Even more herbicides will be used
The authors write: "Importantly, genome editing has made it possible to introduce multiple-gene modifications simultaneously to induce multiple-trait improvements in a plant. For example, Zhang and colleagues have developed wheat, by genome editing, which is resistant to sulfonylurea, imidazolinone, and aryloxyphenoxy propionate herbicides. In addition, Bayer Crop Science is working on soybean that would be resistant to dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate herbicides. Thus, the multiple-HR would be another promising approach to efficiently cope with increasing HR weed problems."
This all suggests the herbicide treadmill that farmers already find themselves on with GM crops is likely to be turning even faster, with farmers needing to pay ever more for seeds that have more and more herbicide-tolerant traits, while also needing to buy more and more herbicides to use with them.
Public acceptance might be a problem
The authors admit that there could be risks that should be investigated further: "More research studies and field trials are required for the assessment of environmental and public health risks associated with gene editing crops, before launch in the market."
They also point to the problem of public acceptance: "The cultivation of genome-edited crops is restricted due to regulatory approvals in some countries, and the major challenge lies in market and commercialization — whether the consumers are willing to accept the product obtained through genome editing. This scenario requires collective effort by companies, stakeholders, universities, and the government to deliver reliable information to achieve public trust towards the non-transgenic genome-edited crops. In fact, the real benefit of this technology can only be availed if it is understood properly and accepted socially."
However, in those countries where gene-edited GMOs are deregulated, they won't carry GMO labels, so the public won’t know what is GM and what isn't. And, of course, there will be no regulatory requirement "for the assessment of environmental and public health risks associated with gene editing crops, before launch in the market" that these scientists admit is needed.
Read this article on the GMWatch site:
https://gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/19753
---
The new paper:
Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing
by Amjad Hussain, Xiao Ding, Muna Alariqi, Hakim Manghwar, Fengjiao Hui, Yapei Li, Junqi Cheng, Chenglin Wu, Jinlin Cao, and Shuangxia Jin
Plants 2021, 10(4), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040621
Published: 24 March 2021

__________________________________________________________