The $2.4 Billion Talent Heist That's Changing Startup Investing Forever

By Josh Baylin, senior analyst, Stansberry Research

Imagine building a startup with more than a million users, more than $80 million in annual recurring revenue, and a $3 billion acquisition offer from OpenAI on the table.

Now imagine that deal gets blocked... and just days later, Google swoops in – not to acquire your company, but to hire you and a few team members for $2.4 billion.

The rest of your company?

Left behind.

The product?

Sold off to someone else.

That's not make-believe. It's exactly what happened last week when Google pulled off one of the boldest maneuvers in the AI arms race – what insiders call a "talent extraction."

And it may be the clearest signal yet that in the new AI economy, humans are the most valuable asset.

This isn't just another strange story from Silicon Valley.

It's a paradigm shift – one that upends traditional ideas of startup valuation, exits, and investor expectations.

Whether you're backing, investing in, or analyzing AI companies, this trend changes how you measure value... and where you look for it.

Silicon Valley Companies Are Buying Up Rare Talent

Windsurf, a private AI coding startup, had impressive metrics: more than $80 million in annual recurring revenue, more than a million users, and a $3 billion acquisition offer from OpenAI.

But according to industry sources, Microsoft's (MSFT) investment in OpenAI – and its ownership of GitHub Copilot, a direct competitor – caused competitive tensions that blocked the deal.

That's when Google stepped in with a different approach entirely.

Rather than acquire Windsurf outright, Google reportedly paid $2.4 billion for its CEO (Varun Mohan), co-founder (Douglas Chen), and a handful of core researchers.

Not the product. Not the broader company.

Just the talent.

The remaining Windsurf assets were subsequently sold to a separate company days later.

And just like that, a startup that looked like a $3 billion unicorn disintegrated – because its core value had already been extracted.

This is just part of a broader trend sweeping Silicon Valley...

In recent months, Meta Platforms (META) has reportedly paid hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation to lure away top AI researchers from OpenAI, Apple (AAPL), and DeepMind.

Amazon (AMZN) hired the founders of Covariant while leaving the robotics startup behind. And Microsoft executed a similar maneuver with Inflection AI, spending $650 million to bring in its top engineers and intellectual property – while the company technically continues to exist.

Each of these deals follows the same pattern: bypassing traditional acquisitions, avoiding regulatory scrutiny, and paying premium prices for elite talent.

And when the product is less valuable than the person who built it? You get deals like Windsurf.

What Matters Most in AI

Windsurf's $2.4 billion disassembly is the new blueprint for AI exits.

The biggest transactions in this space may never show up in acquisition databases... They'll happen in human-resources systems and payroll reports.

And they'll reflect a fundamental truth: In the AI race, talent is the ultimate currency.

So what does this mean for investors?

This trend benefits big tech companies like Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta, and Microsoft... They can collect top people to accelerate their AI development while avoiding antitrust scrutiny.

It also creates opportunities in AI talent infrastructure – companies like recruiting platforms and specialized staffing firms serving the AI sector.

But make sure you're aware of one key risk... The startups themselves can get crushed in these talent extractions. Companies that seemed promising can become worthless when their founders exit, leaving the business shell to be sold separately.

If engineers from OpenAI or DeepMind were to start a company, their "exit" could happen long before the business matures – leaving late-stage equity holders scrambling for returns.

In short, traditional valuation metrics are breaking down. Revenue and profitability metrics may not capture what matters most in AI: people.

For investors, this creates a new calculus.

You're not just betting on technology or markets. You're betting on people – and whether they'll stick around long enough to build sustainable businesses.

The companies that win this war won't just have the best algorithms. They'll have the best strategies for attracting, retaining, and monetizing world-class AI talent.

As I always say: You're either early... or you're obsolete.

Good investing,

Josh Baylin

Tell us what you think of this content

We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.