Moving a bill through the Senate is a complex process. As CoinDesk has reported before, the Senate may want to start from scratch on a market structure bill, meaning it would have to go through a full committee process.
Even if the current version of the bill goes to the floor, the Senate is likely to change provisions or other aspects of the bill, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) told the audience last week. In that event, the bill would move back to the House.
"Right now my best bet would be if we get this done this year, it's probably more likely during the lame duck once the dust settles and everybody who's wearing their jerseys now recognizes we got to get moving on," he said.
Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), who chairs the Financial Services Committee, said he expects legislation to be signed within the next year, pointing to the sheer amount of support FIT21 received (279 votes in favor).
"The White House not issuing a veto threat on FIT21 was helpful and good, and it shows that they want to be at the table and policy here," he said. "The Senate is a more complicated beast. It always is."
The next step for the bill's proponents, he said, is to reach out to Senators about the legislation.
"If we can get two-thirds of the House to vote for this bill, they should be able to get two-thirds of the Senate to vote for this bill or something very similar," he said.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), one of the Democrat lawmakers who voted to overturn the Security and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, said of FIT21 that "what you really need is a regulatory framework."
"That's what Chairman McHenry is trying to do," he said. "You need to be tough on the scamsters, and the rip off artists."
"It's unclear how far that bill will move, but I think Chairman McHenry is right to establish a kind of regulatory framework and put a sharper focus on fighting fraud and ripoff artists," he said.
Over the next few weeks, this newsletter will include transcripts from some of the conversations held at Consensus.
