Utility Dive's Top News

 
Daily edition | Sept.​ 13,​ 2019
 

 

 
 

 
 

Note from the editor

 

The future of state-subsidized resources within PJM's capacity market hangs on a highly-anticipated decision by federal regulators, and we've received feedback about the projected impacts of a minimum offer price rule (MOPR).


Grid Strategies estimated a strong application of MOPR would cost $5.7 billion per year, which the Electric Power Supply Association disputed in an op-ed, accusing the group of "cherry picking" figures. Grid Strategies issued a response and today Utility Dive is running an op-ed from the Electricity Consumers Resource Council, which says the cost of MOPR will place a large and unnecessary burden on the industry.


We welcome their viewpoints and we want to know what you think. What are you looking for in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's upcoming order?


Thanks for reading,



Iulia Gheorghiu
Editor, Utility Dive
Twitter | E-mail
 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Read more news
 

 
 

 
 

What We're Reading


 
 

 

 

 

 
Suggest a story we should read
 
 

From Our Library


 
 

 
View all resources
 
 

Upcoming Events


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

Dive Into a Topic


 
 
 
 
 

Share Utility Dive with others and get rewarded.

 

You've referred 0 readers.

 
 

To become an official Dive Insider, just successfully refer 10 contacts to Utility Dive. Here's your link to share: https://www.utilitydive.com/signup/insiders/?signup_referred_by=5582bbc8fa13a1a13c8b515e