|
|
| | | | | | | How to Evaluate and Select UV Room Treatment Technology | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | A Guide to Navigating Industry UV Claims | Evaluating new UV technology can be difficult, especially with the amount of inconsistent—sometimes contradictory—information available. |
|
|
|
| | This free guide outlines the key factors your facility should consider, including: | | | | | | Clinical Evidence: Is device efficacy supported by reliable 3rd party data? | | | | | | Safety: Does the device protect staff and patients from UV exposure and lamp breakage? | | | | | | Quality: Does the manufacturer develop robust, reliable UV technology? | | | | | | Affordability: How does the investment compare to the cost of infections in your facility? | | | | | | Support: Does the manufacturer help with training, implementation and maintenance? | | | | | | | |
|
| | Detecting and Debunking UV Myths | | | | | Separating spin from science-backed evidence can help determine the best UV system for your facility. Be especially skeptical of unsubstantiated UV claims related to: | | | | | | Short Cycle Times: Claims should include effective distance and pathogen reduction data. | | | | | | Single Placement Protocols: Device must be in line of sight to be effective. | | | | | | Surface Compatibility: Proof of testing for surface and equipment compatibility should be provided. | | | | | | Broad Spectrum: As 254nm is the peak wavelength for UV-C efficacy, broader spectrums include wasted energy. | | | | | Clorox Healthcare is backed by over 100 years of disinfecting experience and provides extensive proof, including 3rd party evidence, validated protocols and more. | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This is an advertisement. © 2018 Clorox® Professional Products Company, 1221 Broadway, Oakland CA 94612 | |
|
|