Whatâs going on here? Target announced plans to shut down nine stores on Tuesday, blaming scaled-up crime for rendering them completely unsustainable. What does this mean? Targetâs shelves have been wobbling under the weight of unsold higher-priced stock, which the retailer canât seem to shift despite the help of a few discount stickers. But itâs not that nobody wants Targetâs products, itâs just the issue of paying for them. The company first admitted over a year ago that stealing â known as âshrinkageâ in retail circles â has been eating into profit. Then in May, it slapped a $500 million price tag on the annual cost of crime on its bottom line. Targetâs head honchos arenât willing to swallow that every year, so theyâre shutting down their most crime-ridden locations across the country. Why should I care? Zooming in: The plot thickens. Now, Target isnât calling out regular folk pinched by the cost of living, because this amount of missing stock is at the level of organized crime. And sure, a missing pallet or two has never been worth kicking up a fuss about, but this is a lot of missing stuff. And since Target will have already paid for all of it, every stolen sale will eat away at the firmâs profit. Without proper intervention, then, the retailerâs stock could end up swimming with the fishes. The bigger picture: Handle with care. Targetâs sticking to its line that missing stock is an industry-wide problem, which could well be true. But so far, other major retailers seem to be coping without bolting down store doors in so-called âdangerousâ areas. Maybe, then, Targetâs especially fragile right now and canât take on any more risks than absolutely necessary. And if thatâs the case, investors neednât tar the whole industry with Targetâs brush. |