If you are unable to see the message below,
click here to view.
|
|
We want to inform you that your subscription is changing. Starting today, you will receive your issues of Credentialing Resource Center Digest on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. If you wish to opt out at any time click here. We hope you enjoy your subscription upgrade! Featured Content | Add EMTALA-based language to privileging forms | Language that addresses the EMTALA requirements to assess, stabilize, and determine a patient’s condition can be added to your delineation of privilege forms as applicable to each specialty for which the medical executive committee (MEC) has established call coverage requirements. The language can simply be stated as follows: “Assess, stabilize, and determine disposition of patients with emergent conditions consistent with medical staff policy regarding emergency and consultative call services.” |
| |
CRC Member Exclusive | The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on a medical staff services educator | In a series focused on how professionals in the medical staff services industry are overcoming unique COVID-19 challenges, Medical Staff Briefing is sitting down with physician leaders, MSPs, quality professionals, educators, and consultants across the country to hear about their experiences. This month, we were able to sit down with a veteran consultant and professional speaker with years of experience providing education to her MSP colleagues. Christina Giles, MS, CPMSM, consultant and speaker for C. Giles & Associates and administrative manager for Edge-U-Cate, LLC, in Nashua, New Hampshire, spoke with us about how the pandemic affected her roles as consultant and educator. |
California appeals court rejects hospital's anti-SLAPP claim | The California Court of Appeals, Fourth Appellate District (the "Court"), affirmed a superior court's judgment that a hospital and several physicians being sued could not invoke the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute because most of the defendant's claims did not arise from protected activities. Additionally, even with the defendant's claims that did arise from protected peer review activity, the Court noted that he still had a probability of succeeding. |
| |
| Contact Us | Karen Kondilis Managing Editor Credentialing Resource Center [email protected] HCPro 35 Village Road, Suite 200 Middleton, MA 01949 800-650-6787 www.hcpro.com For advertising and marketing opportunities with the Credentialing Resource Center, please email [email protected]. | |
Career Center | Post your open positions or find your next career move with the HCPro Career Center. | |
|
| |