MEF Dispatch: Border Security Lapses — Hamas Charity Ti es — Turkey's Nuclear Ambitions

Border Breaches, Islamist Ties to NSC, and Turkey's Nuclear Push

By Ahnaf Kalam ● Sep 23, 2024

Smart Brevity® count: 5 mins...1367 words

National security is faltering as vulnerabilities at home and abroad deepen. From terrorists slipping through the U.S.-Mexico border to federal meetings with Hamas-linked charities, critical lapses are emerging in U.S. defense. Globally, Turkey’s pursuit of nuclear weapons under President Erdoğan and France’s battle against radical Islamist influence further expose the fragility of international security. These growing threats reveal a dangerous reality: borders are porous, ideologies are colliding, and the foundations of global defense are beginning to crack.

Counter-Terrorism Lapses at the Border Open U.S. to Attack

A Jordanian on the FBI watch list attempted to breach Quantico Marine Corps Base last month.

Why it matters: This incident highlights a serious security flaw at the U.S.-Mexico border, where suspected terrorists are slipping through undetected.

Since 2021, 362 illegal immigrants on the FBI’s terrorism watch list have been detained, but the total number of undetected individuals remains unknown.

The big picture: The Biden administration’s handling of border security has been criticized for overwhelming Border Patrol agents, leading to accidental releases of individuals on the watch list.

Notable cases include the release of Mohammad Kharwin, who roamed the U.S. for 11 months before being apprehended.

What’s next: Lawmakers are urged to demand investigations and public hearings to address these security lapses before they result in catastrophic attacks.

FBI Director Christopher Wray has already testified about the rising threat from the southwest border.

National Security Council Embraces Official of Hamas-Contracted Charity

The Biden administration’s national security officials met with Rahma Worldwide founder Shadi Zaza, despite the charity’s ties to Hamas.

Why it matters: Rahma Worldwide has partnered with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, raising concerns about the charity’s influence and federal funding.

Rahma’s support for Hamas’s social programs contributes to the terror group’s radicalization efforts and control.

Details: In October 2021, Rahma’s CEO Shadi Zaza and colleagues met with Hamas minister Ghazi Hamad, offering support for Hamas’s social and charitable programs.

Rahma’s partnership with Hamas has continued, with the charity collaborating with various arms of the Hamas regime and other terrorist organizations.

The big picture: Rahma’s collaboration with Hamas and other terror-linked organizations underscores a broader failure of Western governments to scrutinize and act against Islamist charities.

The Biden administration’s engagement with Rahma and the allocation of taxpayer dollars to the charity highlight potential complicity.

What’s next: Policymakers and counter-extremism analysts must address the implications of government-tolerated Islamist charities and enforce laws against material support for terrorism.

Enhanced scrutiny and legislative action are needed to prevent further collaboration with terror-tied organizations.

Erdoğan Fatwa Giver: Turkey Must Acquire Nukes to Stop Israeli Imperialism

Hayrettin Karaman, a prominent Islamic jurist, advocates for Turkey to acquire nuclear weapons to counter Israel’s influence.

Why it matters: Karaman’s call for nuclear capabilities highlights the escalating tensions between Turkey and Israel, and underscores the growing radical rhetoric within the Erdoğan administration.

Karaman’s influence among Islamists and his position within the government-backed defense industry amplify the significance of his statements.

Details: In an article published on September 8, Karaman argued that Turkey’s current efforts are insufficient to stop Israel and urged collaboration with China and Russia or the acquisition of nuclear weapons.

Karaman criticized the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), arguing that it maintains colonial exploitation through military force.

The big picture: Turkey’s alignment with Hamas and criticism of the NPT reflect a broader strategy to challenge Western and Israeli dominance in the region.

Karaman’s statements resonate with President Erdoğan’s claims about Israel’s alleged territorial ambitions and the need for Turkey to assert its power.

What’s next: If Karaman’s views gain traction, Turkey’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities could further destabilize the Middle East and provoke international condemnation.

Lawmakers and international bodies may need to address the implications of such radical positions within a NATO member state.

Michel Gurfinkiel: France vs. the Middle East – What Next?

The October 7 tragedy has highlighted the impact of massive, non-European, and largely radical Islamic immigration on French society.

Why it matters: The Muslim population in France has grown significantly, affecting the country’s ethnic fabric and societal norms.

In 1997, France’s Muslim population was estimated at 3-6 million; today, it is over 10 million, a nearly 1,000 percent increase in just over half a century.

Details: Annual migration into France includes approximately 200,000 legal and 200,000 illegal migrants, predominantly from Islamic countries in North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East.

Many Muslim immigrants in France aim to impose Islamic values and often vote for anti-Israel, antisemitic, and anti-French political parties.

The big picture: The political landscape in France is transforming, with the far-left party, La France Insoumise, aligning with Muslim radicals, and the National Rally, led by Jordan Bardella, gaining popularity.

The recent general elections reflect a shift in French politics, but coalition maneuvers have left many citizens feeling alienated.

What’s next: France faces a potential worst-case scenario similar to Lebanon, where community conflicts could undermine national unity.

A broad patriotic alliance may be necessary to ensure the survival of France as a democracy and a free nation.

Will Iran Add Saturdays to Weekends? Official Ideology Constrains Practical Policies

Iranian politicians are debating a shift from a Thursday-Friday weekend to a Friday-Saturday model to align with global economic practices.

Why it matters: The current weekend disrupts Iran’s financial institutions for four consecutive days due to misaligned global market closures, hindering economic growth.

Proponents argue that shifting to a Friday-Saturday weekend would better integrate Iran into the global economy and reduce economic disruptions.

Details: The Iranian parliament approved the change on May 15, 2024, but the Guardian Council rejected it, citing Islamic law and the constitution.

Members of parliament are seeking religious endorsements to legitimize the change, highlighting the clash between economic needs and ideological constraints.

The big picture: Iran’s ideological motivations often impede rational policymaking, leading to institutional stagnation and public dissatisfaction.

The debate over the weekend change reflects broader struggles within the regime to balance practical governance with strict adherence to Islamic principles.

What’s next: The outcome of this debate will signal whether Iran can adapt to global economic standards or remain constrained by ideological rigidity.

Ongoing public disaffection may pressure the regime to prioritize governance over ideology, impacting future policy decisions.

Uncontrolled Immigration Is Undermining Spanish Nationality

Spain faces a historic shift as the prison population of young foreigners surpasses that of young Spaniards for the first time.

Why it matters: The rising crime rates among immigrants, particularly from Muslim countries and sub-Saharan Africa, highlight the social and security challenges Spain is facing.

The prison population ratio of young foreigners to Spaniards is now 60:40, with significant contributions from those born in Spain to foreign parents.

Details: Spain’s approach to immigration has led to a qualitative change in the immigrant population, with increasing numbers from Morocco and sub-Saharan Africa.

This shift poses challenges to Spain’s liberal values, gender equality, and social cohesion.

The big picture: The economic argument for immigration is questioned as many new immigrants do not contribute to state coffers but rather consume public resources.

The data shows that immigrants commit crimes at a higher rate than native Spaniards, exacerbating social friction.

What’s next: Addressing the social and security risks associated with uncontrolled immigration requires a reevaluation of Spain’s immigration policies and a balanced approach to integration.

Policymakers must consider the long-term impact of immigration on Spain’s social fabric and national security.

Additional Updates:

READ: “Multiculturalism Is Destroying Canada” by Phillip Carl Salzman.
Canadian politician posits that Western culture has to be destroyed by teaching our children that it is the source of all evil in the world.

WATCH: "Memorializing the Arab-Israeli Wars" with Robert Rook

WATCH: “Israel Insider” with Alex Selsky

As terrorists exploit gaps at the U.S.-Mexico border and charities linked to Hamas continue to gain federal attention, the cracks in our security are widening. Globally, Turkey's nuclear ambitions, France's struggles with radical Islamism, and Iran's conflict between economic needs and ideological rigidity expose vulnerabilities that cannot be ignored. At the same time, Spain faces increasing social tension fueled by immigration and rising crime. With each of these crises intersecting, it’s clear that the balance between security, governance, and ideology is growing ever more precarious.

Sincerely,

Ahnaf Kalam
Digital Media Specialist
Middle East Forum

Feedback

Please share your thoughts on this edition.

Was this edition useful?

Your responses are anonymous

Powered by