If you are unable to see this message, click here to view it in a web browser.

Justia Daily Opinion Summaries

US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
March 19, 2020

Table of Contents

United States v. Eustice

Criminal Law

IberiaBank Corp. v. Illinois Union Insurance Co.

Insurance Law

Singleton v. Elephant Insurance Co.

Insurance Law

Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. NLRB

Labor & Employment Law

Are You a Lawyer? The Justia Lawyer Directory boasts over 1 million visits each month.

Click here to remove Verdict from subsequent Justia newsletter(s).

New on Verdict

Legal Analysis and Commentary

Can the Republicans Cancel the Elections, Even Though Trump Can’t?

NEIL H. BUCHANAN

verdict post

UF Levin College of Law professor and economist Neil H. Buchanan considers whether (and how) President Trump or his supporters in Congress could cancel the 2020 elections, citing public safety as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Buchanan points out that because states control the procedures for the election, Trump would need Republican governors of certain blue states to shut down their state’s elections—something Buchanan stops short of saying is likely or unlikely.

Read More

The Lessons the Coronavirus Crisis Can Teach Us About the Religious Liberty that Serves the Public Good (aka the Framers’ Religious Liberty)

MARCI A. HAMILTON

verdict post

Marci A. Hamilton, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and one of the country’s leading church-state scholars, describes some of the lessons the novel coronavirus pandemic can teach us about religious liberty. Hamilton points out that COVID-19 is nondenominational and nonpartisan, yet we are already seeing some groups claim to be exempt from the public-health prohibitions on large gatherings, on the basis of their religious beliefs.

Read More

US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Opinions

United States v. Eustice

Docket: 18-11519

Opinion Date: March 18, 2020

Judge: Stephen Andrew Higginson

Areas of Law: Criminal Law

The Fifth Circuit affirmed defendant's 84 month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute an unspecified amount of methamphetamine. The court held that the district court did not clearly err in calculating the quantity of meth attributable to defendant; the district court did not err by applying a two-level sentencing enhancement for maintaining a drug premises under USSG 2D1.1(b)(12); and the district court properly assigned two criminal history points.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

IberiaBank Corp. v. Illinois Union Insurance Co.

Docket: 19-30190

Opinion Date: March 18, 2020

Judge: Stephen Andrew Higginson

Areas of Law: Insurance Law

IberiaBank filed suit against the insurers for breach of contract after the insurers denied IberiaBank's claim for coverage in the underlying DOJ Settlement. The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of the insurers' motion to dismiss, holding that the government is not IberiaBank's "client" and did not become IberiaBank's "client" as a result of the Direct Endorsement Program. Therefore, IberiaBank's DOJ Settlement claim was not covered by the policies and the district court properly granted the insurers' motions to dismiss. The court need not consider Travelers' alternative argument.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

Singleton v. Elephant Insurance Co.

Docket: 19-50470

Opinion Date: March 18, 2020

Judge: Per Curiam

Areas of Law: Insurance Law

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint brought by two policyholders against their insurance company, claiming that it should pay for the taxes and fees associated with replacing their totaled vehicles, thus making them whole. The court interpreted the relevant policy language under Texas law and held that each of the policyholders was entitled to the fair market value of his pre-loss vehicle. The court also held that the fair market value does not include the taxes and fees payable to purchase a replacement vehicle.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. NLRB

Docket: 18-60474

Opinion Date: March 18, 2020

Judge: Jennifer Walker Elrod

Areas of Law: Labor & Employment Law

CoServe challenged the Board's ruling that it engaged in unfair labor practices and the Board's issuance of an affirmative bargaining agreement and public-notice-reading order. The Fifth Circuit denied CoServ's petition for review in part and granted in part the Board's cross-application for enforcement. The court held that CoServ abandoned its challenge against the Board's findings of unfair labor practices; under the governing four-factor test, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that CoServ's unfair labor practices tainted the second decertification petition; as to the affirmative bargaining order, the Board failed to justify the bargaining order under Fifth Circuit case law; under case law, a bargaining order was not justified; and the Board's public-notice-reading order was not justified under the facts of this case.

Read Opinion

Are you a lawyer? Annotate this case.

About Justia Opinion Summaries

Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a free service, with 68 different newsletters, covering every federal appellate court and the highest courts of all US states.

Justia also provides weekly practice area newsletters in 63 different practice areas.

All daily and weekly Justia newsletters are free. Subscribe or modify your newsletter subscription preferences at daily.justia.com.

You may freely redistribute this email in whole.

About Justia

Justia is an online platform that provides the community with open access to the law, legal information, and lawyers.

Justia

Contact Us| Privacy Policy

Unsubscribe From This Newsletter

or
unsubscribe from all Justia newsletters immediately here.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Justia

Justia | 1380 Pear Ave #2B, Mountain View, CA 94043