Don’t Trust This Bullshit Rally |
Friday, 8 December 2023 — Melbourne, Australia | By Kiryll Prakapenka | Editor, Fat Tail Daily |
|
In this issue: [WATCH] What’s Not Priced In — what to make of the Santa Rally Bill Bonner: a retrospective look at the gradual decline of a once-great power… |
|
[3 min read] Dear Reader, This is a bullshit rally. So said Greg Canavan in an internal group chat. Gruff, blunt, direct. To him, the recent melt-up makes little sense. The ASX 200 recording its biggest one-day gain in a year following weak GDP figures only confirmed Greg’s suspicions. Real GDP per capita growth is negative year on year. Households saved only 1% of their income in the September quarter. And more of our disposable income is going to taxes than it has in years. Market saw all this, shrugged, then bid stocks higher. Some may be revelling in the Santa rally (like my colleague Callum Newman). Cal’s long said pessimism is misplaced. But not Greg. Like the Grinch, he doesn’t buy the festive exuberance. More on that in a bit. But first, in this jam-packed episode of What’s Not Priced In, Greg and I covered: Dubious nature of recent stock rally Market’s new rate narrative: but is a soft landing really the most likely outcome? Greg’s ‘lower and sooner’ September call Big moves in gold and Bitcoin Is gold looking to march higher from here as real rates fall? Is appetite for riskier assets growing? Lithium stocks and the EV adoption paradox Are coal stocks cheap? Washington Soul Pattinson’s bid for Perpetual a sign of emerging value on ASX Markets and narratives Markets abhor a narrative vacuum. Events quickly beget explanations. Whether an explanation is accurate often matters less than the fact an explanation exists. The 24/7 news cycle worsens this. Journalists feel pressured to contextualise daily fluctuations in stocks or tiny changes in yields. Market commentators feel pressured to give smart answers to the same gyrations. Everyone feels pressured to reach for the popular narrative. Easier to parrot the prevailing explanation than stick your neck out. Better the collective failure than individual embarrassment. If the narrative proves false, no matter. Since everyone espoused it, no one was really wrong. It was simply a surprise, a shock, not an error. With the Internet, narratives now run at hyper speed. They coalesce quickly…and collapse just as fast. Look at how the ‘higher for longer’ theme is playing out. It was the explanation du jour a few months ago. Bonds plummeted. Yields soared. Now markets are all about rate cuts. The CNN Fear and Greed index was at extreme fear at the start of November. It’s now flashing greed. Not even the fashion industry has a turnover this quick. Revisiting September Consider our mid-September episode. There, Greg argued the ‘higher for longer’ narrative will change to ‘lower and sooner’ as markets catch on to the economic reality. Greg said (my paraphrase): ‘If I'm right about this — lack of fiscal stimulus, tight monetary policy and its lagged impacts — it will send inflation lower. And it will force central banks like the Fed to cut sooner than the market currently thinks. So the 'higher for longer' crowd will realise rates have to come down, and quickly. We're at mid-September now. Let's give it 2–3 months and see whether that view starts to shift. Because these things do take time. ‘But that would be one non-consensus that I think people should begin considering. How to take advantage? Look at gold. Gold often moves in ways opposite to real interest rates ... Gold's in a bit of a stealth bull market ... No one's really interest in gold at the moment, you hardly hear about it.’ The view did shift (and gold did move). But it didn’t take time. And it shifted for different reasons. Greg thought consensus would switch because of predicted economic weakness. It switched because of a predicted soft landing. Consider this. Last month, Goldman Sachs’s US financial conditions index recorded its biggest monthly drop in four decades. Benign disinflation Recently, I came across a good book by James Valentine. In it, Valentine wrote how investors go wrong by focusing on immaterial factors. Factors that don’t move the needle. He had a great table summarising how investors can mistake irrelevant factors for critical ones: Now, let’s do an exercise along these lines. The market currently believes lower interest rates are coming soon and this is good for stocks. This is true if disinflation is benign and the economy remains resilient. This is not true if interest rates fall because the economy is deteriorating. This is not true either if inflation remains sticky, prolonging tight monetary policy. As Greg said, quicker than expected rate cuts follow worse than expected economic performance. The market is positioning for rate cuts and growth. For instance, consensus forecasts have S&P500 earnings lifting 11%, with the benchmark US index trading at 18.6x those earnings. But can you really have rate cuts and growth? Watch the episode for the answer. In the meantime, beware the bullshit rally. PS: In the countdown to Christmas, Fat Tail’s awesome design team mocked up Fat Tail’s version of an advent calendar. Today was my turn. Keep sending your questions, and maybe I’ll keep wearing hats! Regards, Kiryll Prakapenka, Analyst and host of What’s Not Priced In Kiryll Prakapenka is a research analyst with a passion and focus on investigating the big trends in the investment market. Kiryll brings sound analytical skills to his work, courtesy of his Philosophy degree from the University of Melbourne. A student of legendary investors and their strategies, Kiryll likes to synthesise macroeconomic narratives with a keen understanding of the fundamentals behind companies. He’s the host of our weekly podcast What’s Not Priced In where he and a new guest week figure out the story (and risks and opportunities) the market is missing to give you an advantage. Follow via your preferred channel and check it out! Advertisement: ‘ELECTRIFY EVERYTHING’ That’s the latest catchphrase that’s going to save the planet. Australian State and Federal governments are already pouring billions into this initiative. See why this could be one of the biggest investment opportunities of the decade for Aussie investors… CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY |
|
America, What the Hell Happened? |
| By Bill Bonner | Editor, Fat Tail Daily |
|
[5 min read] Dear Reader, In Bishop Fulton J. Sheen’s book (1954 / 63 cents), ‘Way to Happiness,’ he lamented, and I quote, ‘Lenin once said that America would collapse by spending itself to death.’ I assume that the good bishop was paraphrasing Vladimir. US Federal debt at the time stood at nearly $300 billion compared to the $33 trillion that you and colleagues have been slamming (rightfully) over the past several months. What a ‘way to happiness.’ ~ From a Dear Reader We are looking at how things have changed…from the dynamic prosperity of the ‘30 glorious years’ 1950–1980…when Bishop Sheen wrote his book…to the huge, (largely fake) boom of our adult lives, the 1980–2020 period. The rich got very rich in the second period, including Buffett and Munger. But everybody else struggled to stay even. Debt rose. Prices rose. Real wages did not. As we’ve seen, Milton Friedman’s new money system did not really eliminate inflation and debt crises; it made them worse. Honest prices — especially honest prices for credit — are the True North to navigators on the wide capitalist sea. There’s a lot of water. And it’s not easy to get where you want to go. Distorting prices with Fed policy mistakes is like shifting the stars or bending the compass; a lot of sailors end up on the rocks. In Search of a Solution ‘Do you have to write about it every day,’ asks a sympathetic reader? Of course not. But the facts change daily. And we, trying to make sense of them, can’t afford to get behind. It is like a giant box into which your 7-year-old has scrambled all of last year’s Christmas lights. The sooner you get started…untying the knots, following up the loose ends, replacing the bulbs…the sooner you’ll be able to put them up again. But how do the strands connect? Where are the plugs, the adapters…the switches? There’s no other solution: you have to dig in and find them. Besides, our insights come with the news, in 24-hour cycles. We see the reports. We read the headlines. We wonder. Then, usually around 5am…we have an insight: we left the controls in the drawer under the sink! It’s not the actual price movements…or the incoming ‘data’…that complete the picture. Both are noisy, almost random. It’s the bigger picture we want to see. Humans have changed little over the last 200,000 years. They are fairly predictable. Read history and you will see the patterns. Empires, for example, follow a fairly well-known arc — from growth to expansion…and then overstretch, rising costs, corruption, decay…and finally, failure. America appears to be in the ‘rising costs-corruption’ stage. We know too that every empire that comes on the scene has to exit sooner or later. And here we are thinking not so much of the US empire itself, but of the entire last 500 years of European domination. Historians and Grave Robbers We leave it to future historians and grave robbers to tell us when the decline actually began, what caused it, and when we Americans became the ‘bad guys.’ We don’t know, of course, but we imagine the current period — in which Europe and America are complicit with Israel in obliterating Gaza — will feature prominently in their analyses. In the meantime, we focus on what big changes that have occurred over the last 70 years. ‘What has happened to America?’ asks a former US ambassador to the Soviet Union. Jack Matlock was instrumental in working with Reagan and Gorbachev on the ‘détente’ of the 1980s…which led to the end of the Soviet empire. Recently, he was looking at a speech he had given in 1982. It was a speech to the Czechs, explaining why America was such a great country. Re-reading it, he wonders: what went wrong? Highlighting the differences between Soviet Rule and the US system, he said — in 1982 — that, in the US… …states and governments are created by the people to serve the people and that citizens must control the government rather than being controlled by it. Furthermore, we believe that there are areas of human life such as expression of opinion, the practice and teaching of religious beliefs, and the right of citizens to leave our country and return as they wish, which no government has the right to restrict. Last week, Matlock wondered if we can… ‘...really say that our citizens ‘control the government’ today? Twice in this century we have installed presidents who received fewer popular votes than their opponents did.’ The Ship of State But that scarcely scrapes the surface. Even if citizens always got the politicians they voted for, they still would not get the policies they want. Who wants a $1 trillion deficit? But we have one. Who wants to support two wars overseas, neither of which is of any vital national interest? Who wants to pay for the billions squandered in agencies, committees, programs and departments encrusted like barnacles on the ship of state? We heard from the directors of two of those parasite organisations on Saturday night. The scene was a museum ‘opening night.’ Centre stage was the director of the National Endowment for the Humanities…and some other agency we never heard of. Both took applause for a show no Member of Congress and few members of the ‘public’ will ever see. Still, the museum director, the trustees, board members, collectors, and art historians congratulated each for spending other peoples’ money. Matlock continued in 1982: ‘Through our history we have faced many challenges but we have been able to surmount them through a process of open discussion, accommodation of competing interests, and ultimately by preserving the absolute right of our citizens to select their leaders and determine the policies which affect their lives.’ In 2023, Matlock has his doubts: Since when have we seen an open discussion and accommodation of competing interests in the work of the US Congress? When in this century has there been a debate on foreign policy? Why has Congress repeatedly authorised violence normally legal only during a state of war without voting a declaration of war as the Constitution requires? In 1982, he went on: …we are convinced that no individual and no group possesses a monopoly of wisdom and that our society can be successful only if all have the right freely to express opinions, make suggestions and organize groups to promote their views. In 2023, the story is different. You have a right to free speech… ‘...unless you are a Member of Congress who speaks out in defence of the rights of Palestinians to live in freedom in their ancestral lands, or students at Columbia University who wish to do the same.’ In 1982, he proclaimed the intent of US foreign policy was to... ‘...work for a world in which human diversity is not only tolerated but protected, a world in which negotiation and accommodation replace force as the means of settling disputes.’ Forty-one years later, he wonders what we were doing in ‘Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Syria, or Palestine…or, for that matter, in Iran, Cuba, or Venezuela.’. Ambassador Matlock was upbeat in 1982. His cause was just. His conscience was clear. He winds up: Nevertheless, I speak to you today with optimism, since I know that my country enters the 207th year of its independence with the determination not only to preserve the liberties we have at home but to devote our energies and resources to maintaining peace in the world. And then, his head pops up 41 years later and asks: ‘OH, LORD, WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO US?’ ‘Is this the ‘way to happiness?’ he might have followed up. Ambassador Matlock is referring to US foreign policy. What about domestic policy? What has happened to us there? Stay tuned... Regards, Bill Bonner, For Fat Tail Daily All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment. |
|
Advertisement: Could You Face Getting Locked OUT from Ever Buying Gold?... See this map: This is where one of the most sinister plots in Aussie mining history was hatched. A scheme filled with deception...theft…and cold-blooded murder. And it’s driven by one goal: to LOCK OUT regular Aussies like you from ever buying gold. Watch the shocking expose here. |
|
|