Dismantling the Surveillance State

Coindesk.com

Klicken Sie hier, um Coindesk.com zu abonnieren

Kategorien: Kryptowährung Kryptowährungsnachrichten Alter: 19 - 30 Jahr 31 - 64 Jahre 65 Jahre und älter

Laden...

3 jahre vor

Html
Text

PLUS: Tether's FATF approach, GameStop's Web 3 play and more |

The biggest crypto news and ideas of the day

Oct. 26, 2021

If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here.

Sponsored by

Welcome to The Node.

Questions? Feedback? We'd love to hear from you! Simply reply to this email.

–Daniel Kuhn

Today’s must-reads

Top Shelf

STABLECOINS: The U.S. Treasury Department has reportedly moved one step closer to granting the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) broad authority to regulate stablecoins, according to a Bloomberg article citing anonymous sources. Meanwhile, stablecoin issuer Tether announced Tuesday that it has begun a trial partnership with Notabene to help it combat money laundering in cross-border transactions.

NEW BUSINESS? CoinList, a token sale platform that offers regulatory-compliant initial coin offerings, closed a $100 million funding round that valued the company at $1.5 billion. CEO Graham Jenkin told CoinDesk the capital will in part finance expansion into stalking and lending business lines. Meanwhile, GameStop has posted a job listing indicating its looking to build an Ethereum-based Web 3 arm. Finally, Helium is partnering with internet service giant DISH on its quest to build a user-powered wireless network.

LAW ABIDING: International police including the FBI-led Joint Criminal Opioid and Darknet Enforcement (JCODE) and Europol have busted a group of 150 alleged darknet drug traffickers, seizing $4.9 million in cryptocurrencies. Separately, the Bank of Spain has (finally) issued instructions for banks on how to register potential crypto-related services in the country.

A message from Nexo

When it comes to buying, borrowing or earning on your crypto, you won’t find an easier, safer way to do it than Nexo.

And right now, with its Referral Program you can earn $10 worth of bitcoin for each friend you refer. And the best part – your referral gets $10 in BTC, too.

You can invite up to 100 friends – so you can get as much as $1,000 in bitcoin by copy-pasting a few links. And you can further bump that amount by earning up to 8% interest p.a. on your bitcoin, paid out daily.

Now is the time to unlock the full power of your crypto.

Join Nexo and start earning free BTC with your friends.

What will 2022 bring? Crypto 2022 is CoinDesk’s ambitious effort to scope out what’s next. This week it's Policy Week, a week devoted to exploring the complex ways governments are interacting with the cryptocurrency ecosystem, and how policy decisions or lack thereof will affect the year ahead. Read more here.

What others are writing...

Off-Chain Signals

No, China isn't soliciting public opinion on whether to drop its bitcoin mining ban (The Block) Rand Paul says crypto could become a global reserve currency (Axios) SuperRare Posts Best Month as Single-Edition Ethereum NFT Prices Soar (Decrypt) SEC Chair Gary Gensler has grave predictions for DeFi (Yahoo)

A message from Polymesh

Polymesh: The securities-specific blockchain

Polymesh is an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, streamlining antiquated processes and opening the door to new financial instruments. It solves regulatory challenges with public infrastructure around identity, compliance, confidentiality, governance, and settlement through key design principles built into the base layer of the chain, rather than as external add-ons.

Discover how Polymesh is tailored to the needs of capital markets and securities. Join Polymesh today.

Putting the news in perspective

The Takeaway

Taking Responsibility for the Patriot Act

Today marks 20 years of the so-called “Patriot Act,” a law passed to “deter and punish” suspected terrorists in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Many provisions of the law were unconstitutional, many were ineffective. In fact, in 2015 a subsequent law replaced the act. Taken as a whole, however, the effect of the Patriot Act was to cheat U.S. citizens out of their civil rights and cheapen American democracy.

It’s time to dismantle the surveillance state engendered by the Patriot Act. It’s also time to invest in and build alternative technologies that would make the law (partially) irrelevant. Issued in the name of collective security, the law eroded some of the most basic protections you might expect in a liberal democracy.

“Twenty years of hindsight confirm that expanded government surveillance comes at a steep price for civil rights, our democratic legitimacy and marginalized populations,” American Constitution Society President Russ Feingold wrote in a recently syndicated op-ed. “Congress has a unique opportunity to begin the deconstruction of the surveillance state. It should seize it.”

There is a balance between national security, which requires investing authorities with the ability to detect potential threats and punish wrongdoers, and protecting individual freedoms. We’ve gotten this dance all wrong. The legacy of the Patriot Act is widespread wiretaps, unchecked warrants and a nosy state interested in reading your financial, medical and travel records.

A government that can glance at your email inbox, monitor whom you call and infer your bedside book stack knows far too much about what you’re thinking. Creepy, sure, but also illegal.

As the EFF notes in a fact sheet, the Patriot Act, officially known as the "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001” violates constitutional gaurantees in four keys ways:

“Violates the Fourth Amendment, which says the government cannot conduct a search without obtaining a warrant and showing probable cause to believe that the person has committed or will commit a crime. “Violates the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech by prohibiting the recipients of search orders from telling others about those orders, even where there is no real need for secrecy. “Violates the First Amendment by effectively authorizing the FBI to launch investigations of American citizens in part for exercising their freedom of speech. “Violates the Fourth Amendmentby failing to provide notice - even after the fact - to persons whose privacy has been compromised. Notice is also a key element of due process, which is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.”

The majority of American people are not “domestic terrorists,” yet we’re all (potentially) treated as such. The Patriot Act was grafted onto the preexisting Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (better known as FISA), which was passed in 1978 to help the government gather foreign intelligence and investigate international terrorism. It applied only to an “agent of a foreign power” and information gathering was limited to “common carriers,” or hotel stays, storage lockers and car rental services, the EFF notes.

Nowadays, just about anyone or anything could find its way onto a watchlist under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), for instance, can obtain a secret court order to monitor any “tangible” assets said to be relevant to a national security inquiry. (This mandate lapsed earlier this year, and was checked partially by the U.S. Supreme Court, but can still be applied to ongoing cases.)

According to Jake Laperruque, a lawyer for the nonpartisan government watchdog Project On Government Oversight (POGO), Section 215 was used to collect records from over 19 million phone calls in 2018 alone. In response to evidence of overcollection, the National Security Agency (NSA) shut down its program.

This might be understandable if it actually provided security, but time and again, the NSA has failed to provide evidence any of this information gathering over nearly two decades has contributed to preempting a terrorist plot. (Though there’s plenty of evidence suggesting would-be terrorists were coaxed into their worst plans.)

What about the anti-terrorist financing or money laundering provisions of Section 314? The Financial Times asked and answered: “Two decades on, it is virtually impossible to define the percentage of funds illicitly moving in and out of the global banking system, away from the prying eyes of global rulemakers.”

Feingold, a former U.S. senator representing Wisconsin between 1993-2011, cast the only vote against the Patriot Act. It was a courageous stand in 2001. He now advocates for strengthening the judiciary's role in counterterrorism efforts and limiting the broad powers invested in the surveillance apparatus to monitor U.S. civilians. But to some extent he doesn’t go far enough.

The courts will be key to restraining “the surveillance state.” But the world is also a much different place than two decades ago. Even while citizens and media personalities push back against government snooping – everyday Americans (largely) accept some form of corporate surveillance.

Government surveillance is now intertwined with Big Tech. Amazon, Palantir and Chainalysis are just a few examples of private companies that sign big-ticket contracts with government agencies to fork over individual’s information.

Tiffany C. Li, a visiting professor at Boston University School of Law and a fellow at Yale Law School's Information Society Project, advocated in an MSNBC column for a federal privacy law, bans on corporations working with exporting data and new norms around sharing.

I’d add to that list: Individuals and organizations should be investing in the tools that guarantee privacy at a foundational level. People should trial new technologies and take greater responsibility for their personal information.

There’s no reason to trust surveillance agencies or mega companies to do the right thing. And legislative and judiciary efforts to limit the control of the public and private “surveillance apparatus” have largely been hamstrung. The right tools exist, many are coming online, and crypto-funded research is making it possible – though they should also be approached with skepticism.

–Daniel Kuhn

Sponsored Content

KardiaChain - GameFi Opens New Paths for Financial Inclusion

Bitcoin introduced the world to blockchain technology and the concept that people can exchange value from peer to peer without the involvement of any government or bank. The Ethereum blockchain then introduced the concept of smart contracts and decentralized applications.

Those innovations encouraged early adopters to develop blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. The next wave of adoption will come from a younger generation. These people spend their time gaming. But the current business model of gaming means these people are earning money for game publishers rather than earning it for themselves. GameFi changes this completely by returning the incentives and the value to the players.

The Chaser...