QUESTION: Why are certain ASX critical metal stocks quietly rising in 2024? You’ll get a veteran exploration geologists’ answer in a new report called ‘The Next Potential Aussie Mining Disruptor’. Read it here now. |
|
Monday, 22 April 2024  | By Ryan Dinse | Editor, Crypto Capital and Alpha Tech Trader |
|
[4 min read] In this Issue: - Investing at the intersection
- Three ways to invest in energy tech
- We’ve seen how the feds pushed the Primary Trends of 1980-2020 to extreme levels.
|
|
Dear Reader, I came across an interesting chart this week. Check it out:
You can see the clear cycles in play. From 1990 to 2000, tech stocks were the place to be. After the ‘dot com’ bust, energy stocks performed much better until the GFC panic of 2008. Tech then resumed its dominance until another crisis – this time, Covid – hit in 2019. See that slight uptick over the past few years? It’s early days, but if this pattern holds, energy could be the theme to follow over the next few years. Could investing be this simple? Perhaps. But as a tech investor, I see an exciting way to invest through this, no matter what sector dominates… Investing at the intersection Governments the world over are trying to brute force a once-in-a-lifetime change to our entire energy system. The goal is to achieve zero net carbon emissions (net zero), and fully electrify the system. Whether this is anywhere near achievable in the time scales aimed for is a big question up for debate right now. And some of my more sceptical colleagues think the world will continue to run on fossil fuels for a lot longer. If you agree with that line of thinking, then you should be looking out for any opportunities that arise in the oil, coal and natural gas sectors. I know our contrarian-in-chief, Greg Canavan, has some gas and coal plays in his Fat Tail Advisory portfolio right now. On the other hand, our resident geologist, James Cooper, thinks copper and aluminium demand is set to soar as transmission lines are repurposed for a grid dominated by renewables. He’s got some very interesting mining stock ideas based on that here. But my beat is technology. And on that front I think there could be some very exciting opportunities at the intersection of technology and energy. I’m talking about energy tech stocks! With that in mind, let’s look at several opportunities to ride a potential incoming ‘energy-led cycle’ – but with a tech twist… Three ways to invest in energy tech First up… Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMRs). Depending on who you listen to, they’re either the next big thing, or a pie in the sky fantasy. So which is it? I’ll get to that in a second, but first let’s look at how these SMRs work As the name implies, SMRs work like regular nuclear fission reactors but on a smaller scale. SMRs are a cheaper option for nuclear power and are seen as a safe alternative to traditional large-scale power plants. They still use uranium as the ‘fuel’ to generate heat, though some advanced options are researching other options, such as thorium and even metallic fuels. Of course, like regular nuclear plants, they’re a very green power source. According to the WEF, there are 50 SMR concepts on the go globally with four at an advanced stage. Argentina is building the CAREM reactor, which will generate 25MW of power. China is building the Linglon One reactor, which will produce 125MW. And Russia has two SMRs under construction. The much-publicised NuScale project in the US was mothballed last year, citing funding issues. That has been highlighted by the naysayers a lot in recent times. But I think this is a powerful technology that will be part of our energy future, and it’s definitely a trend worth following. As an investor, this can mean looking for stocks aligned with constructing or running such plants or even just uranium miners in general. Next up… Bitcoin Mining! Yes, I know I bang on a lot about Bitcoin. But I bet you didn’t know that Bitcoin mining is very, very good for incentivising the rollout of renewable energy projects. As Kiwi clean energy entrepreneur Daniel Batten wrote recently: ‘Just as NASA catalysed years of R&D into photovoltaics, Bitcoin mining is now catalysing R&D into an important form of baseload renewable energy technology that would otherwise have been cost prohibitive.’ The key thing to realise is that, unlike fossil fuel-powered plants, you can’t just turn renewable energy on or off. Power will be produced when the Sun is shining, the wind is blowing, or the waves are rolling in. But that can mean an imbalance between energy supply and demand at certain times. Long-term, that will mean more batteries to store excess energy, but at the level of the entire grid, that could be decades away from being realistic. Right now, the best option to manage this equation are Bitcoin miners. Bitcoin miners are the ultimate partners in flexible demand. Not only do they allow renewable power to balance itself out, but also provide additional revenue streams to fund the build out of renewable energy infrastructure itself. There’s a wonderful company operating in Africa called Gridless that uses Bitcoin mining to help fund power plants for many communities in rural Africa. Unbelievably, there’s 770 million people in the world without access to electricity; many of them in Africa. Gridless wants to help fix that. As a piece last year interestingly noted: ‘Gridless wasn’t born with a focus on bringing bitcoin mining to rural Africans. The company’s main aim was to offer affordable energy through microgrids. ‘Bitcoin just uniquely enabled that capability.’ Despite years of fake news on this subject, the world is slowly starting to recognise the reality. As a piece in Forbes Magazine recently wrote: ‘The synergy between renewable energy initiatives and bitcoin represents major opportunities towards sustainable technological advancement. This integration opens new pathways for sustainability and enhances economic viability of renewable energy projects. ‘Companies like OceanBit and Sazmining show how this partnership can drive innovation and foster environmental stewardship.’ All these companies mentioned above are private companies – so you can’t invest in them directly. Owning some Bitcoin gives you exposure to the overall Bitcoin eco-system. And while Bitcoin carries risk and is highly volatile, I strongly suggest everyone should add a small stack to their overall portfolio for the long term. There are also a number of Bitcoin miners listed on US markets you can invest in, including IREN, a Bitcoin mining and AI (Artificial Intelligence) data centre company run by two Aussie brothers. They’re doing some really exciting stuff. Talking about AI… I’m running out of space today, but AI also has the potential to be a force in the energy market – as well as a huge user of energy itself. As time is short, I’ll leave you to mull over this quote from the International Energy Agency (IEA): ‘It is therefore unsurprising that the energy sector is taking early steps to harness the power of AI to boost efficiency and accelerate innovation. ‘The technology is uniquely placed to support the simultaneous growth of smart grids and the massive quantities of data they generate. Smart meters produce and send several thousand times more data points to utilities than their analogue predecessors. ‘New devices for monitoring grid power flows funnel more than an order of magnitude more data to operators than the technologies they are replacing. And the global fleet of wind turbines is estimated to produce more than 400 billion data points per year.’ Things are changing on the energy front, that much is certain. How can you take advantage of it? That’s the trillion dollar question… Good investing, Ryan Dinse, Editor, Crypto Capital and Alpha Tech Trader Ryan is a former financial advisor who over seven years helped more than 600 clients and had more than $150 million under management. This experience taught him that the mainstream investment industry has no interest in helping clients strive for greatness. He was told to make ‘safe’ investment plays and settle for average returns. It wasn’t good enough for Ryan. In 2016, he embarked on a renewed mission: to help ordinary people lock onto extraordinary trends before they go mainstream. He’s an experienced small-cap trader and an expert in cryptocurrencies. He first bought Bitcoin [BTC] in 2013, when it was around US$600. Today, it’s around US$30,000. His crypto advisory is a must for anyone looking to make digital assets a part of their long-term portfolio. Check it out here. His tech advisory Alpha Tech Trader aims to identify and latch onto strong emerging opportunities in the tech sector, wherever they are in the world. Get more info here. Advertisement: GOLD FOMO? It’s no secret the yellow metal has seen a historic bull run in 2024 — rocketing up day after day. But our in-house gold expert Brian Chu is warning Aussie investors about rushing into the gold market without a plan. He says: ‘DON’T buy gold…until you watch this.’ CLICK HERE NOW TO WATCH BRIAN’S FULL VIDEO BEFORE THURSDAY 2 MAY |
|
 | By Bill Bonner | Editor, Fat Tail Daily |
|
[3 min read] Dear Reader, The gist of the Big Boom of the 40+ years from 1982 onward was this: Wealth left the consumer, Main Street economy (thanks to lower prices on foreign-made goods and a loss of jobs in the manufacturing sector) and went into the financialised economy (thanks to ultra-low interest rates). Stocks soared. Wages stagnated. The next period is likely to be the opposite. Money will be taken out of the capital economy (absorbed into US bonds)... and put into the consumer economy (via deficits). Higher Rates, Lower Stock Prices How helpful is that insight? We don’t know... but we’re just trying to understand how the Primary Trend in the markets — higher interest rates, lower real stock prices — connects to the patterns of US policies. We’ve seen how the feds pushed the Primary Trends of 1980-2020 to extreme levels. Now we look to see how they could exacerbate or moderate today’s market trends going forward. To do this, we watch. We wait. We listen. You cannot understand how an ant colony works by becoming an ant. Nor can you understand modern American politics by becoming a Democrat or a Republican. You have to stand back and observe. Like an anthropologist trying to study a never-before-contacted tribe. He can build a McDonald’s restaurant... or set up a child welfare office in their midst. But he’ll distort behavior; he won’t learn much. In the world of finance, too, it pays to be invisible. Non-partisan. Unprejudiced. We bring it up because there are many news teams who insist on saying ‘the Fed should do this’. Or, the ‘government should do that’. We don’t really care what the Fed should do. What we want to know is what it will do. Inflation appears to have become embedded in the system. It is no longer fueled primarily by monetary policy (ultra-low interest rates) but by fiscal policy (ultra-high deficits). Each year the feds take one to two trillion dollars more (in deficits) out of the financial economy. Investors buy bonds. This goes to the ‘non-discretionary programs,’ such as Social Security and Obamacare. And it also goes to discretionary programs, such as the one hundred billion that Biden has spent on weapons to be used to kill Russian soldiers and Palestinian civilians. This money finds its way into earnings and wages... and eventually into consumer prices. Poverty on a Slow Burn The process is insidious. Tom mentioned the prices at McDonald’s. 40 years ago, you could buy a Big Mac for $1.60. Today it is $5.99, almost 4x more expensive. Over the last 10 years, the Big Mac has gone up from $3.99 to $5.99 – a 50% increase. Big Macs were the cheap, fast way for the working class to eat. Statista gives us an average hourly wage in 1986 of $6.20. At that rate it took about 15 minutes of work to buy a Big Mac. Today, Statista tells us that the average wage per hour is $19, which works out to about 18 minutes to buy a Big Mac – three minutes more. That’s not just inflation; that’s poverty on a slow burn. Over 38 years, working people got poorer. Charlie Bilello shows us how the feds’ inflation figures further distort the real story: ‘According to the US Government, the cost of health insurance in the US has declined 15% over the last year and is 3% lower than it was 5 years ago. ‘How is that possible when we know that the cost of health insurance is certainly much higher today than five years ago? ‘The government is not using actual premium data to determine the cost of health insurance, but instead using changes in the retained earnings of health insurers. So when their retained earnings decline as they have over the past few years, the government says that the cost of health insurance has declined as well.’ Government policy has now changed. The Fed can no longer boost the financial economy with ultra-low interest rates. Lower rates would increase capital flight out of the bond market and make it more difficult for the feds to borrow the trillions of dollars they need. Unable to support the stock market, it will have to let stocks fall. But our guess is that falling stock prices and rising interest rates will bring a crisis that the Fed won’t be able to stand. It will turn on the printing press and go ‘Full Sh*thole.’ Even that, however, will not reverse the trend... it will only make it worse. Stocks will go up — spectacularly, as investors ditch bonds in order to protect themselves from inflation. But in real terms... adjusted for inflation... the value of America’s capital stock will go down as it becomes harder and harder to make long term investments and innovations in a high-inflation economy. And that’s not all. There are other policies — neither monetary nor fiscal — that will help keep the Primary Trend... towards lower real stock prices and higher interest rates... in gear. We’ll look at them tomorrow. Regards,
Bill Bonner, For Fat Tail Daily All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment. |
|
|