The Daily Reckoning Australia
Banks Are Out…Where Does That Leave Us?

Friday, 31 March 2023 — Albert Park

Brian Chu
By Brian Chu
Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia

[7 min read]

Quick summary: The last three years showed us that we’re not only past the point of no return, but there’s an existential threat to the system. The approach to keeping the system from falling apart is to plug up the most at-risk institutions and place our reliance upon them by covering debt with even more debt. Ever tried to quench your thirst by drinking sea water? The crisis is averted…this’ll age well!

Dear Reader,

Banking crisis? What banking crisis?

The markets are trading now as if disaster’s averted.

UBS Group AG [NYSE:UBS] has rescued Credit Suisse already. First Citizens Bank [NYSE:FCNCA] and HSBC Holdings [LSE:HSBA] have mopped up Silicon Valley Bank. The NASDAQ Index is now in a bull market, having recovered 20% from its lows last December.

The idea is to combine failing banks into a larger bank and having the nation’s central bank provide billions of dollars’ worth of credit to paper over the cracks. This way, you’ve got another ‘too big to fail’ bank to act as the backstop. This was the strategy used in 2008–09 when we went through the subprime crisis. A few trillion dollars from central banks globally held the system together and the markets were off on their merry way.

So time to move on, bears! Come back when there’s another crisis.

Though that might not happen in our lifetime, according to US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen when she was the Chair of the Federal Reserve back in 2018.

Hang on a minute, though, there’s one asset that’s signalling things aren’t under control.

Sounding the alarm of a system in trouble

Something stands out in this financial system above the rest, and for the longest time.

You’ve guessed it, gold.

In a distressed environment, people can dump fiat currencies, shares, bonds, real estate, cryptos, and even commodities.

But dumping gold? You need to be pretty desperate to do that!

If there’s a crisis at hand, you’ll see gold dip for a short while before it reasserts its strength. Therefore, I like to use it to gauge the health of the global financial system.

Right now, it’s telling me that things are pretty ominous.

Check out the price of gold in USD terms. It’s been trading at close to US$2,000 an ounce and has remained stubbornly above US$1,900 for almost two weeks, as you can see in the figure below:

Fat Tail Investment Research

Source: Thomson Reuters Refinitiv Datastream

[Click to open in a new window]

You might correctly point out that gold is higher now because the US Dollar Index [DXY] has fallen. Yes, that’s the case as it’s inched down in the past month, and looks like we might have seen the peak in mid-2022, as you can see in the figure below:

Fat Tail Investment Research

Source: Thomson Reuters Refinitiv Datastream

[Click to open in a new window]

But let’s look at the intrinsic gold price, which you can calculate by multiplying the price of gold by the US Dollar Index (treating it as a percentage). As I write this article, gold is at US$1,970 an ounce, and the US Dollar Index is at 102.4. This means the intrinsic value of gold is US$2,017.

How does that sit in the historical context? Let me show you in the figure below, which outlines the intrinsic price of gold since 1971 (when the US dollar and gold effectively decoupled):

Fat Tail Investment Research

Source: Thomson Reuters Refinitiv Datastream

[Click to open in a new window]

As you can see, the above figure shows quite effectively how our financial system has fared over the past five decades. The spikes in 1980, 2007–12, and 2019–20, demonstrate the times when the system seized up and the governments and central banks needed to heavily devalue the US dollar to revive the system.

Interestingly, the system appeared to be rather stable between 1983 and 2005, at least as implied by this indicator. We know for a fact that there were several crises that occurred, including the 1987 Black Monday crash, the Latin American debt crisis in 1994, the tech bubble in 1999–2000, and September 11 in 2001. But at least gold managed to trade in a relatively tight range and the US dollar was able to retain its value against it for an extended period.

The key reason for this?

The US Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker famously raised the Federal Funds Rate sharply from 1979–81 to control runaway inflation caused by the 1970s oil crisis. The rate was as high as 20% in June 1981, choking the currency supply and thereby successfully bringing down inflation. This was not without a sharp yet short-lived recession in 1982.

That drastic move managed to control inflation and bring about almost two decades of economic prosperity and growth.

That’s unlikely to repeat itself. US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke tried something to control inflation in 2012 by artificially changing the relative demand for short- and long-dated bonds (known as Operation Twist). It succeeded for a few years (I’d guess around seven years based on the above figure) in reviving the purchasing power of the US dollar without raising the interest rate during a period when the system was recovering from the ravages of the subprime crisis that began in mid-2007.

And what I see ahead of us could be the worst to come.

Waters recede before the tsunami hits

The fact of the matter is that the system never fixed itself, and neither was it the intention of those making decisions if you know how and where to look.

Playing with the currency supply via controlling interest rates and inflation to spur economic productivity is pushing on a string.

And not only that, the currency supply is unable to shrink when the global populace, whether as corporations or individuals, is hooked on debt as a way to spur growth. You can only kick the can down the road, temporarily reducing the supply of debt before heaping it back into the system.

The last three years showed us that we’re not only past the point of no return, but there’s an existential threat to the system.

The approach to keeping the system from falling apart is to plug up the most at-risk institutions and place our reliance upon them by covering debt with even more debt.

Ever tried to quench your thirst by drinking seawater? Multiply that exponentially and you’ll get the idea.

The idea of ‘safe as banks’ is dangerous. It’s been a self-propagating disaster.

Right now, we’re in a brief period of calm before that big storm. It feels like the waters are receding from the coastline before the massive tsunami.

The crisis is averted…this’ll age well!

So where does it leave us?

Some are paying down their debt to ensure they don’t lose what they already own. That’s prudent. Debt is like that jet ski you’re towing behind your yacht. When waters get choppy or your boat is springing a leak, you don’t want something to drag you down.

Some are running to the new form of money — cryptocurrencies. It went through quite a beat-up in the last 18 months and some tokens are showing signs that it’s ready for the collapse of the US dollar.

I like gold. It’s a shining beacon of light on its own solid and unsinkable island. You mightn’t be able to eat it but someone will desire it as long as there’s a living man or woman still in existence. Its value is in the primal desire ingrained within us, hence it won’t fall to zero.

It also has no counterparty risk. Gold can’t go broke and leave you with nothing. You hold it, it’s yours.

On the other hand, if you’re OK with risk and want to speculate on something with a lot more upside potential, there’s the entire market of gold mining stocks at your disposal. I’ve got a portfolio lined up over in my premium trading service, Gold Stock Pro.

And, if you’re in for an even bigger thrill, you can check out Fat Tail Investment Research’s brand-new, ultra-speculative mining trading service Mining: Phase One, which just launched last night. You can check it out by going here.

God bless,

Brian Chu Signature

Brian Chu,
Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia

Advertisement:

Are you in on our ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ stocks yet?

Where some are making raging bull market-level gains...

...regardless of interest rates, recession fears, and what the wider market does?

In its annual round-up of performance, the Sydney Morning Herald observed that this alternate universe produced ‘eye-watering gains’ last year...

...while most other stocks — plus cryptos and bonds — got murdered.

To find out which stocks our resident exploration geologist has picked as buys, go here.

Middle-Class Blues
Bill Bonner
By Bill Bonner
Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia

Dear Reader,

Uh oh. More bad news for the middle class. Fortune: ‘National home prices fall for the seventh straight month’:

On Tuesday, we learned that U.S. home prices as measured by the seasonally adjusted Case-Shiller National Home Price Index fell for the seventh straight month in January. Since peaking in June, U.S. home prices have fallen 3% on a seasonally adjusted basis, and 5% without seasonal adjustment.

‘…that 3% drop in single-family house prices marks the second-biggest home price correction of the post–World War II era.

And this from the Wall Street Journal: ‘Most Americans Doubt Their Children Will Be Better Off, WSJ-NORC Poll Finds’:

An overwhelming share of Americans aren’t confident their children’s lives will be better than their own, according to a new Wall Street Journal-NORC Poll that shows growing skepticism about the value of a college degree and record-low levels of overall happiness.

Today and tomorrow, we look at it from a different angle…and see why it is likely to get whacked even harder.

‘Don’t fight the Fed’

Karl Marx believed the driving force of social/political/economic history was the struggle between the classes.

Richard Lachmann believed it was the struggle within various elite groups.

Lachmann is probably more right than Marx. The masses pay taxes. They vote for their leaders. They die in wars. But they are not the deciders. Even revolutions are usually led by disenchanted members of the elite, not by the common man.  

Lachmann is probably right, too, when he says the actual course of events is an accident…the product of competition between elite factions, along with unpredictable technological and social developments.  

Not interested in macro, socio-historical blah-blah? We aren’t either. But ‘don’t fight the Fed’ has been good advice for the last 40 years. Will it be good advice for the next 40? The Fed controls monetary policy. And the federal government controls fiscal policy. Between the two of them, they decide the future of the US dollar…and the US economy. Naturally, we want to know what they’re up to.  

Remember, it is not by guessing, one day to the next, about stock prices, that you really make money on Wall Street. Instead, it is by being in the right place at the right time…and staying there as the Primary Trend runs its course.  

Recall, too, that the Primary Trend reversed itself — after four decades — in two turnarounds. The bond market hit a record high in July 2020. The last time it had done that was around the time we were born — in 1948. Since 2020, it has been going down.

And the stock market topped out at the end of 2021. The Dow rose by more than 36,000 points. It has been dropping ever since…with tempting bounces along the way. (One of the endearing features of a bear market is that it tries to take as many investors as possible down with it. Over the past 40 years, 1982–2022, investors learned to BTD [buy the dip]; now, every bounce leads them back into dip-buying…and then the market dips again.)

But back to Lachmann…

Divide the conquerors

In short, he may be on to something. And it may help us understand what is coming next.

The elite have approximately US$50 trillion in new wealth, thanks to the policy choices of their compadres at the Fed and the federal government over the last 30 years. Congress spent money it did not have. And the Fed financed the deficits at ultra-low interest rates. Those low rates were responsible for an orgy of borrowing and spending that 1) raised corporate profits and asset prices, 2) provided vast funds for elite projects (such as stock buybacks…the invasion of Iraq…the COVID Lockdown…), and 3) led to today’s US$90 trillion debt burden.

Historically, the US could comfortably carry debt equal to 1.5 times GDP. That is, for every dollar of output (GDP) we could afford US$1.50 worth of claims against it (debt).

But the Fed’s way-too-low, for way-too-long interest rate policy distorted the old relationships. Had normal interest rates produced normal debt levels, we’d have total debt today of about US$40 trillion. Instead, we have US$90 trillion…or US$50 trillion too much.

Who will decide what happens to the excess? Not the voters! The deciders will decide. And there are only two broad possibilities. Deflation or inflation. Either the excesses are reckoned with in the traditional, honest way — with bankruptcies, defaults, and market crashes. Or they are inflated away.

Clearly, the elite prefer inflation, because much of the ultimate cost will fall on the public, not on themselves. But here’s where it gets interesting. Lachmann tells us that when the elite is divided, it often cannot get what it wants. Republicans versus Democrats…conservatives versus liberals…left versus right — are the internal divisions so deep that the elite cannot stick together…

…and stick it to the common man?

Tune in on Monday for more…

Regards,

Dan Denning Signature

Bill Bonner,
For The Daily Reckoning Australia

Advertisement:

This ‘Double Leverage’ Stock Could Be a Smart Pick in 2023

It’s a $1 billion stock leveraging two niches set to bounce back in the coming months: tech and travel.

And it’s selling at a 45% discount at the time of writing.

Click here to access it.

Latest Articles
We’re Going to Need More, So We Need to Find More…
By Selva Freigedo
Today, you'll be hearing from one of our analysts, Selva Freigedo, who has a special interest in the commodities sector. Albemarle’s recent takeover offer for Liontown Resources has sparked the lithium sector. It’s also highlighting the fact that while lithium prices have dropped, securing lithium supply still isn’t that easy.
Read on
Time to ‘STFB’?
By Bill Bonner
‘How did this happen?’
Read on
Part Two: Copper…the New CRUDE
By James Cooper
Copper sits at the heart of the electrified economy…meaning it could become the most important commodity in national energy security. That’s why James Cooper believes copper is set to become the new CRUDE OIL. Read on to find out how you can profit from this opportunity…
Read on
Connect with us on social media:
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Youtube