Laden...
| The biggest crypto news and ideas of the day Dec. 20, 2021 If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here. Sponsored by Welcome to The Node.
Questions? Feedback? We'd love to hear from you! Simply reply to this email.
Today’s must-reads Top Shelf PARALLEL UNIVERSE: Polkadot, an underlying framework for connecting various blockchains, launched its first set of parachains this weekend after five years of development. The first five to be auctioned off – Acala, Moonbeam, Parallel Finance, Astar and Clover – are essentially layer 1 blockchains built for decentralized finance (DeFi). Meanwhile, Gear Technologies, a smart-contract layer supporting the Polkadot blockchain framework, has raised $12 million, to “provide a fast track for smart-contract development.” Gear hopes to launch a testnet in early 2022.
NEXT-GEN FINANCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE: JPMorgan Chase has partnered with German industrial group Siemens to develop a semi-distributed system for payments using the bank’s Onyx blockchain. Siemens is Onyx’s first “anchor” client, and will use the system to automatically transfer and verify U.S. dollar payments between its own accounts. Meanwhile, Figment, a backend infrastructure provider for proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains raised $110 million in a Series C. Morgan Stanley’s Counterpoint Global, Binance Labs, Franklin Templeton and others contributed in the round led by software giant Thoma Bravo that valued the firm at $1.4 billion.
THAT’S GRIM! Yield compounding tool Grim Finance suffered a $30 million “reentrancy” exploit on Sunday. Built on the Fantom Opera network, Grim Finance allows users to stake their liquidity pool tokens in what it calls Grim Vaults, automatically harvesting yields and re-staking rewards using strategies for even higher yields. Stolen fantom tokens were routed to other Fantom-based decentralized exchanges (DEX) including AnySwap and SpookySwap, where the attackers exchanged them for other cryptos including the dollar-proxy asset USDC. Grim developers paused all vaults on Sunday to prevent further damage, though the platform's total value locked plummeted.
FINANCIAL STABILITY: The Bank of England is facing challenges in finding the information it needs on institutional exposure to crypto, and plans to ramp up the pace of international talks on establishing a regulatory regime for the assets. The growing number of banks offering crypto trading and custody for clients requires global rules to protect the financial system, Sarah Breeden, the BOE’s executive director for financial stability strategy and risk, told the Sunday Times. She called for collaboration between the G-20’s Financial Stability Board.
FIAT YIELDS? MicroStrategy (MSTR) officials outlined some potential ways the company could generate yield from its 122,478 bitcoin stockpile during a virtual investor day last Thursday. The enterprise software firm turned unofficial bitcoin investment vehicle is considering lending some BTC to “trustworthy” counterparties, putting a “lien” on it with other software firms or even mortgaging it out, CEO Michael Saylor said. MicroStrategy began investing in bitcoin in 2020 – replacing the majority of its cash holdings and taking on debt to accumulate to mitigate inflation expectations – and now owns about $5.8 billion of the asset. Saylor said no formal steps had been taken to further financialize its BTC horde.
A message from Nexo When it comes to buying, borrowing or earning on your crypto, you won’t find and easier, safer way to do it than Nexo. And here’s what’ll happen next: you and your referrals will both get $25 in BTC within 30 days of them passing Advanced Verification and topping up the equivalent of $100 or more of any asset supported on the Nexo platform. There’s no limit on the number of people you can refer, so invite as many friends as you’d like!
Overheard on CoinDesk TV... Sound Bites "Money is too important to be left to the central bankers."
–Former CFTC chairman and founder of the Digital Dollar Project Chris Giancarlo, on CoinDesk TV's "First Mover."
What others are writing... Off-Chain Signals We All Need to Stop Only Seeing the Dark Side of Crypto (Wired) The New Get-Rich-Faster Job in Silicon Valley: Crypto Start-Ups (NYTimes) The U.S. government has a massive, secret stockpile of bitcoin — Here’s what happens to it (CNBC) Terraform Labs Hits Back at SEC: ‘No Jurisdiction over Do Kwon’ (Blockworks). Meanwhile: Terra's UST Flips DAI to Become Fourth-Largest Stablecoin (Decrypt) Instagram “actively exploring” NFTs: CEO Adam Mosseri (Decrypt); while Facebook paid $60 million for Meta Financial naming rights from a regional U.S. bank (Reuters) Circle Exec: Banking Rules on Stablecoin Issuers May End the Industry (Blockworks)
A message from NowRX This company’s share price increased 1,650% from 2016 – Own a piece today!
NowRx is disrupting the $480B retail pharmacy industry using proprietary software and robotics to provide a more personalized, hassle-free pharmacy experience.
In 2020, the company saw revenue grow 90% YoY and this year they’re on pace to top $22M. Oh and did we mention their telehealth service grew over 3,000% since January?
Don’t miss your chance to own shares of this high-growth startup!
Putting the news in perspective The Takeaway NFT Plagiarism Isn’t Going Away In a tweet thread last week, the digital artist Lois van Baarle said she’d discovered “132 instances” of her artwork being minted as NFTs on the marketplace OpenSea, all without her permission.
“NFTs are supposedly about authenticity, but these platforms … do less than the bare minimum when it comes to making sure that the images are being uploaded by their original creators,” she wrote. (NFTs are non-fungible tokens, unique digital assets on a blockchain).
Van Baarle, whose online moniker is “Loish,” makes highly stylized paintings and character designs with an eye toward the colorful and cartoonish. A simple search for the word “Loish” on OpenSea yields plenty of NFTs for these sorts of drawings, many of which have been delisted in the wake of last week’s tweets.
But van Baarle is hardly the first artist to have her work minted and sold on NFT platforms like OpenSea. Shepard Fairey, who rose to prominence as the artist behind former President Obama’s “Hope” campaign poster, and has since become a crypto believer, has complained publicly about his work being minted on Rarible (another NFT marketplace) in much the same way.
Moderation is definitely an issue, as van Baarle points out – it takes about two seconds to find a wealth of incredibly hateful and bigoted NFTs on OpenSea. But the larger problem has to do with the market dynamics underpinning the entire NFT ecosystem.
An NFT is just a token that links to a media file: Anyone can spin one up (OpenSea has a handy template for this, but Rarible and SuperRare and plenty of other platforms have similar systems), and anyone can sell one. There’s no mechanism in the underlying code – that is, the smart contract – for determining the authenticity of the image or video or song attached to the token.
With NFTs, authenticity is entirely extrinsic. Rarible might bestow a “verified” checkmark on the page of a creator whose works it has deemed authentic, but the vast majority of artists on these platforms are unverified. And there’s nothing really stopping anyone from right-clicking a work by a verified artist, downloading it and re-uploading it to the same platform as another NFT.
“Ownership,” in this context, is the process of recording addresses on the ledger. Through explorer websites like Etherscan, anyone can see who minted a token and who’s since paid for it. NFTs don’t come with a “bundle of rights,” since they involve no enforceable contracts. And while you can see the creator’s address, you’re always going to need external confirmation that X address actually belongs to Y creator.
In theory, this sense of authenticity is what imbues an NFT with value. Back in April, an NFT of the Nyan Cat meme (an old favorite of the early 2010s internet) sold for $600,000 because Foundation (the company behind the marketplace where the NFT was sold) organized a promotional campaign around the original artist’s involvement. Even if someone else minted another Nyan Cat NFT with that same image, it wouldn’t have the blessing of the original artist. It’s that blessing that’s created the most value, so far.
The sale was framed as an example of the ways in which NFTs supposedly offer increased autonomy for artists: a chance to recapture some of the value that’s been lost to the endless reproducibility of online images.
But just as often, NFTs are a vehicle for intellectual property theft. This morning I typed my own name into OpenSea and found a CoinDesk article by my colleague, Sam Ewen, minted as an NFT; my name was in the metadata.
Needless to say, neither of us sanctioned this listing.
OpenSea is far from the only platform with this issue. Decentralization has come to be synonymous with “censorship-resistance” – without moderators, spam, bigotry and theft are inevitable. A 2019 article in Verge detailed the ways in which the blockchain streaming service Audius relies on this sort of thing as a business model. And anyone can put graffiti directly on the blockchain.
Blockchain filtering services may eventually do what the spam folder did for email, automatically separating out the junk and notifying artists when their images have been minted as NFTs. But it’s not reasonable to expect every single artist to file an individual claim for each stolen work. The extent of the infringement is already too broad.
Artists should stay keenly aware of the inherent dangers here. Even if you never touch an NFT, your work could be stolen by some enterprising scammer. In a way, it’s easier to steal work from artists outside of crypto; if you’re not monitoring the blockchain, as many NFT artists now are, you’re less likely to notice the theft.
Companies with the most to gain from promoting NFTs are the ones with the responsibility to rein this in. If OpenSea genuinely wants to share the wealth with creators, as opposed to the technologists and investors powering the NFT boom, it needs to protect their interests, too.
Sponsored Content
FBG Capital: Why Investors Are Excited About the DeFi-zation of GameFi
Splitting the ownership and utility of gaming assets opens huge investment opportunities for GameFi, potentially making game finance bigger than decentralized finance (DeFi). The GameFi sector is young but booming, and this is very exciting for investors. The financial components of GameFi include on-chain leasing solutions, fractionalization, staking, game non-fungible tokens (NFT) dedicated marketplaces, layer 2 solutions for blockchain games and others.
GameFi and DeFi have many similarities but there are also some crucial differences.
The Chaser...
The Node A newsletter from CoinDesk Copyright © 2021 CoinDesk, All rights reserved. 250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA Manage your newsletter subscriptions | Unsubscribe from all CoinDesk email |
Laden...
Laden...
