|
This week's guide to Crisis Management This week's email features a look at Are Zoom depositions making us go a little mad?; Tips for improved business automation when working with investors; How the exhaustion doctrine applies to licensing agreements; Many employers caught between the vaccine and a hard place; Tips on termination: Recent case examines parties' rights. For more on Crisis Management be sure to visit our website, crisismanagementupdate.com. We'd love to hear your thoughts or feedback on this newsletter. Please contact Patrick Brannan at [email protected]. | | | |
|
|
|
| | Are Zoom depositions making us go a little mad? As annoying as they can be, Zoom depositions are likely here for good. They are cost-effective, timesaving, provide easier accessibility for all parties involved and help insulate us from contagions. Read more > |
|
|
|
|
| Tips for improved business automation when working with investors One of the major challenges in today’s changing world is the choice to go about all business activities the old-fashioned way you are used to, or to automate business processes more. Read more > |
|
|
|
|
| IP Frontiers: How the exhaustion doctrine applies to licensing agreements The exhaustion doctrine is a longstanding, common law doctrine that limits the extent to which a patentee can control those rights after a first “authorized sale.” Under the exhaustion doctrine, once an authorized sale of a patented product occurs, the patent holder's exclusive rights to control the use or sale of that product are said to be "exhausted," and the purchaser is free to use or resell that article without further restraint from patent law. Read more > |
|
|
|
|
| | Many employers caught between the vaccine and a hard place Vaccine mandates are becoming more popular among large corporations and small businesses alike. But one in five Americans remain vaccine-resistant. What is an employer to do?. Read more > |
|
|
|
|
| Tips on termination: recent Washington case examines parties’ rights Owners and contractors should consider the recent Washington Supreme Court decision Conway Construction Co. v. City of Puyallup, which emphasizes the importance of carefully drafting, and following, a construction contract’s termination provisions. Read more > |
|
|
|
|