What’s going on here? AI startup Anthropic is on the brink of raising $2 billion in brand-new funding, which would give it an ovation-worthy $60 billion valuation. What does this mean? Anthropic – maker of the Claude AI chatbot – is only four years old, and its new potential valuation is more than triple the $18 billion it hit just last year. The startup is hugely popular among programmers, businesses, and big-name investors. Amazon, for one, has poured $8 billion into it. It’s no surprise: the buzz around generative, “learning” AI models and their potential to transform how we work and live has been driving eye-popping investments for two years now. And firms like Anthropic, xAI, and OpenAI are locked in an expensive race to develop breakthrough, market-leading models. Why should I care? Zooming out: Promises, promises. AI investment has been rolling in, but profits are still nowhere to be seen. Companies like Anthropic are playing the long game, betting billions on the technology’s transformative potential. And, sure, if those hefty wagers pay off, the rewards could be sweet – both for the tech investors who put up the dough and for the industries that might benefit from bigger profit and improved productivity. But let’s be real: that’s far from guaranteed. The bigger picture: Not everyone’s a winner. Investors on the hunt for the next AI payday likely had their ears pricked this week, when Nvidia’s CEO called robotics a “multitrillion-dollar opportunity”. But there’s a flipside: this tech could lead to devastating job cuts that have the potential to cripple economies. No wonder labor unions across a wide range of industries – from dockworkers to delivery drivers and grocery employees – are pushing for greater job protections. With every advance that AI makes, it sparks big questions about who stands to gain – and who might lose. |