The highly choreographed Two Sessions meetings are the annual centrepiece of Chinese Communist party (CCP) messaging around the country’s direction. And while it’s not exactly full of surprises, it’s a crucial guide to what Xi Jinping (pictured above) sees as his country’s priorities. It consists of gatherings of the National People’s Congress (NPC), the party’s legislative body, and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), a talking shop for business leaders, academics and others from across the country. (Helen Davidson has a full primer here.) “It’s a grand ceremonial event,” Amy Hawkins said. “But all the decisions are predetermined – the NPC has never rejected a bill put before it. So the most significant element is what’s being emphasised.” Ahead of its conclusion tomorrow, here’s a summary of what we’ve learned. Economic woes | Growth struggles and a new strategy At the opening of the NPC, China’s premier, Li Qiang – second only to Xi Jinping in the CCP – announced a 5% target for GDP growth this year. That is the same target as last year, and while it might sound like a boom to Europeans, it is relatively conservative by China’s standards, going by the past 20 years. “The aim has been to project a mood of stability,” Amy said. “China has had a really turbulent few years with the pandemic, the state of the economy and now dealing with a capricious United States.” That is not to say that the 5% figure will be easy to meet, though. “The target was only met last year with a huge last-minute export boom as people rushed to sell goods to the US before the Trump tariffs came in,” Amy said. “You’re seeing the after effects now – exports in January and February were pretty low.” All of that sits in the context of a bleak wider economic picture, causing a serious rethink of how China’s economy operates. Amy rattled off a list of difficulties: “Unemployment is a big problem. Property prices are really down. Business activity is down. And people are not spending money post-Covid. So what China needs to do is boost consumer demand. We heard a lot of that this week.” One important measure outlined at the NPC was a plan to raise China’s deficit target to 4% of total output, up from 3% last year. That is particularly significant given anxieties about borrowing on a local level: huge deficits amounting to trillions of dollars were run up to fund infrastructure projects that helped the country after the 2008 financial crash. “Xi Jinping has really cracked down on debt, so this is a big step to take,” Amy said. “But there is a growing acceptance that you can’t just boost the economy through people in other countries spending money and expect that to trickle down.” Trump’s tariffs | Rhetoric grows more hostile The recognition in China that an economy relying heavily on exports doesn’t necessarily benefit ordinary people stands in sharp contrast to the response in Canada and Mexico, where Trump’s gyrations on tariffs have caused more upheaval. Crucially, China sends just 14% of its exports to the US, against 83% in Mexico and 77% in Canada. “For the average person in the street, the domestic economic picture is much more of a priority,” Amy said, referring to China. “People in Beijing don’t feel the effects in their daily lives unless they’re working in exports.” Nonetheless, the tariff threat has already had an impact: imports have fallen sharply, by 8.4% at the start of this year – perhaps a sign China’s manufacturing base is cutting back in anticipation of new restrictions on sales to the US. And the subject is the source of intensifying official rhetoric. “A week ago, the trade war felt largely symbolic,” Amy said. “But then Trump doubled the tariffs last week, and China has responded in kind,” with a 10-15% charge on American farm products coming in from today. Meanwhile, there is no sign that China is interested in the kind of gestures that have appeased Trump, at least for now, in Mexico and Canada. Last week, a foreign ministry spokesperson said that Beijing would “fight to the end” with the US in a “tariff war, trade war, or any other war”. The US and Russia | Scepticism about Trump’s new world order |