Item one: The lies are the point |
Fascism is not a political program. It’s different from every other -ism in this way. Capitalism means something specific: private ownership of the means of production. Communism means the opposite: state (or worker) ownership of the means of production. Socialism is, or used to be, a softer form of communism. It’s hard to say what it means now, and by the way, Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are not democratic socialists. They’re social democrats—Google the difference, and you’ll see what I mean. Anyway. Fascism is a sensibility far more than it is a political program. The word comes to us from ancient Rome, where the fasces was a bound bundle of wooden rods with an ax (or sometimes two) that symbolized political power. It wasn’t always bad; next time you visit the Lincoln Memorial, look below Abe’s hands—those are fasces. They were literal back in Rome, and Cincinnatus, who served as dictator for just 16 days, is famous for having spurned them. He remains one of the few leaders in history who refused absolute power and returned to private life, the other prominent one being our own George Washington, who easily could have made himself dictator in the mid-1780s but refused to do so. The day in 1783 when he stopped off in Annapolis, where the Continental Congress was meeting, and resigned his military commission is the day the United States became a republic. Fascism developed its modern meaning in Italy in the 1920s, under Benito Mussolini. He coined the term in 1919. He ascribed to it certain attributes—absolute state power over private enterprise, racial superiority of the majority group—but it really revolved around the power of the dictator, the dictator’s emotional connection to his followers, and their complete obeisance to him. It’s mystical and hard to describe. It can’t be defined in any constitution. It’s just something you can see and feel. I once saw a clip of Adolf Hitler giving a speech. After he was introduced and the applause quieted, he stood silent at the podium for almost a minute before he started speaking, quietly. That minute was fascism. That is what Donald Trump wants. He already has it, in the sense that his rallies are fascist rallies. His backers surrender themselves to him in a way that small-d democratic admirers of Barack Obama and George W. Bush did not. This is why his poll numbers among Republicans go up and up. He has cemented the mystical bond. What he lacks, for now, is the power. We’re in a race now between republicanism, rule by citizens for the common good, and fascism, rule by a dictator for the good of his followers. |
|
|
|
In a democratic society, the law is the most efficient means by which to arrest fascism. This is why Trump faces indictments. It’s the surest way to stop him. Smart fascists know this, and they either stay within the law or, perhaps paradoxically, violate it so flagrantly that they end up redefining what “the law” even is. Fortunately for us, Trump is a dumb fascist, and his ignorance may prove to be his Achilles’ heel. We also—again fortunately—have a system and set of laws and traditions that are stronger than those of, say, Weimar Germany, so Trump hasn’t yet been able to pollute them, although if he is reelected, he certainly will. The new felony charges announced Thursday evening by the office of special counsel Jack Smith are simultaneously shocking and unsurprising. It stands to reason that Trump wanted the computer server that hosted Mar-a-Lago security video deleted. Yes, it’s especially ironic, given the way he carried on about Hillary Clinton’s server in 2016, but this too is a key attribute of fascism: Fascists do precisely the thing they accuse their opponents of doing. In August 1939, Goebbels accused the Poles of violence against Germans in the Danzig Corridor. It’s the only way fascism can work; to get the people to believe the opposite of the truth. Even Trump, dumb as he is, instinctively knows this. Look at his recent statements. “This is prosecutorial misconduct used at a level never seen before. If I weren’t leading Biden by a lot in numerous polls, and wasn’t going to be the Republican nominee, it wouldn’t be happening. It wouldn’t be happening.… But I am way up as a Republican and way up in the general election, and this is what you get.” He’s not ahead of Joe Biden. It’s a close race—disturbingly so—but, according to RealClearPolitics, Biden is narrowly ahead. And of course it’s not prosecutorial misconduct. Grand juries—American citizens—indicted Trump, not prosecutors. The only prosecutorial misconduct in Trump’s life was the laxity of the New York prosecutors who failed to nab him over the past 40 years. If they’d been doing their job, the nation might have been spared this turmoil. With these next two indictments, assuming they happen, the mystical bond will grow deeper. Trump’s lies will intensify; his movement will become more openly fascistic. The law is the surest way to stop all this. But even convictions won’t end it. They’ll keep him out of the White House, most likely, but the Republican Party has probably been permanently transformed. The next Trump can’t wait to grab the fasces. |
|
|
|
Item two: I remember when Congress tried to do stuff |
With the House headed toward summer recess, I’m reading the occasional summation of the 118th Congress so far. Here’s Punchbowl News Friday morning: “[Kevin] McCarthy is now a full seven months into his speakership and we can say one thing definitively about him—he’s survived. No one has filed a motion to strip McCarthy of the speaker’s gavel despite the weekly rollercoaster that is the House Republican Conference.” Talk about a low bar! Is this really something to celebrate? Ponder this question. Have you ever heard in these last seven months Kevin McCarthy or any Republican speak about anything that directly impacts the lives of most working Americans? Have they mentioned health care? Wages? Education? I suppose some of them may have mentioned these things, but they sure don’t emphasize them. And they definitely don’t want to do anything about any of them, because that would smack of state action, and we can’t have that under any circumstances. We know what the House Republicans talk about instead. The travails of the American middle and working classes would all be solved if only Hunter Biden were in jail. That would set everything right. The Hunter Biden obsession, by the way, is also fascism in its purest form. As I wrote above: Fascists do precisely the thing they accuse their opponents of doing. They employ the phrase “Biden crime family” because they know very well that the Trump clan is a crime family. The most effective way to deflect people’s attention from that is to call the Biden family corrupt. Their devotion to doing nothing to help the American people is not, in the main, fascism. That’s just servility to donors, mostly, although base-stroking is in play here too to some extent, and that carries a fascist whiff. Whatever the reason, it’s madness. Exactly four bills have become law this Congress. None of them have to do with improving working people’s lives. How about campaigning on that, Democrats? |
|
|
|
Item three: Our octogenarian dilemma |
So, that Dianne Feinstein moment was … sad. I do hope you realize, though, that she has to hang on and stay on the job. The reason? Her position on the Judiciary Committee, where Democrats hold an 11–10 advantage. Committee memberships in the Senate are decided jointly by the chairman and the ranking member—in this case, Dick Durbin and Lindsey Graham. In April, Graham blocked a resolution to replace her. So if she were to resign or … whatever, the committee would be deadlocked at 10–10. That means no federal judges, whom Biden has been appointing at a record pace. Her vote is desperately needed, even when Patty Murray has to shout at her to just vote “aye.” |
|
|
|
|
The Run-Up is a TNR newsletter by staff writer Grace Segers, featuring all the news that matters from all the races that matter. |
|
|
|
|
Last week’s quiz: “Gee, queen of the prom!” All about Barbie. |
|
|
|
|
1. Ruth Handler invented Barbie, based on a doll she saw in Germany in 1956. Barbie debuted in America three years later. What was the unique selling point of Barbie at the time? |
A. She had moving joints. B. She had brushable hair. C. Her eyes moved. D. She was an adult at a time when nearly all girls’ dolls were infants. |
Answer: D, adult. Interesting thing about Barbie’s eyes, though. Barbie had what Wikipedia calls a “demure sideways glance” until 1971, when her eyes were changed to look straight ahead. |
2. Barbie has had more than 250 careers. In 1965, she did something remarkable that even humankind had not yet done. What was it? |
A. She cloned a sheep. B. She invented the Frisbee. C. She invented the artificial heart. D. She went to the moon. |
Answer: D, she went to the moon. See photo here. And note … demure sideways glance! |
3. What year did the first Black Barbie doll appear? She was called, please forgive me, “Colored Francie.” |
A. 1967 B. 1968 C. 1970 D. 1971 |
Answer: A, 1967. Story and photos here. That “Colored” is weird, but 1967 is earlier than I’d have thought. |
4. Ken debuted in 1961. But it took until Valentine’s Day 2004 for Barbie and Ken to do what? |
A. Get married B. Have a baby C. Break up D. Have sex (as officially acknowledged by the Mattel Corp.) |
Answer: C, they went to splitsville. But they reunited in 2011, in case you were worried. |
5. What artist of the Pop Art school appropriated the Barbie image for a painting? |
A. Roy Lichtenstein B. Andy Warhol C. David Hockney D. Peter Max |
Answer: B, Andy Warhol. Story here. All were plausible choices though, especially Lichtenstein. |
6. Barbie made the cover of Time magazine in 2016 with what development? |
A. Introduction of the first openly gay Barbie B. Introduction of the first Muslim Barbie C. Introduction of new body types D. Introduction of Barbie as candidate for president |
|
|
|
|
|
This week’s quiz: Liberté, Égalité … I see that today is the anniversary of Robespierre’s execution. So let’s talk French Revolution. |
|
|
|
1. Robespierre, author of the Reign of Terror, was a member of which political faction? |
A. Jacobins B. Girondins C. Montagnards D. Cordeliers |
2. How many prisoners were being held in the Bastille when it was stormed on July 14, 1789? |
A. 1,211 B. About 500 C. 106 D. Seven |
3. What revolutionary leader was killed in his bath, stabbed to death, inspiring the famous painting by Jacques-Louis David? |
A. Danton B. Saint-Just C. Marat D. Necker |
4. What was innovative about the guillotine, according to the case made for it by Joseph-Ignace Guillotin to King Louis XVI? |
A. It was far more efficient than previous methods and could kill more people faster. B. It was more humane than prior methods of execution. C. It was portable and could be moved from location to location. D. It was designed to maximize pain. |
5. A sartorial moniker came to be applied to the commoners of Paris who were supporters of the revolution. What was that nickname? |
A. Sans-culottes, because they wore full-length pants, not the breeches favored by the nobility B. Contre-chapeaux, because they opposed the wearing of effete haberdashery C. Hommes-bottes, referring to the boots worn by working men D. Ceintures-nons, referring to the fact that commoners did not wear sashes |
6. Returning to Robespierre: Thomas Carlyle, in his epic 1837 history of the French Revolution, used a phrase to describe Robespierre that has gone down in history as one of the great, imperishable descriptions of a tyrant. What was the phrase? |
A. The “livid lictor” B. The “imperious imperator” C. The “sea-green incorruptible” D. The “monster athwart men” |
|
|
|
|
|
This, incidentally, is probably my favorite book of all time. —Michael Tomasky, editor |
Note: A few weeks back, I asked a question about the lyrics of “Route 66.” In the answer, I gave one incorrect line of lyric. Reader Carl Lowe wrote in to say that “down through Missouri” was wrong. The correct lyric is “Joplin, Missouri.” Sorry, Joplinites. Hey, blame Mick Jagger, not me (and happy 80th birthday, Mick! Did everyone see Keith’s lovely Twitter birthday wish to Mick? Beautiful). Anyway, you too can get a Fighting Words mention if you correct me! And Beth, my dear Beth—yes, I oppose the Beach Boys and all their works! Well, many of their works. Not all. Feedback to [email protected]. |
|
|
|
Don’t miss a word of our award-winning independent journalism. |
Download the app. Log in. Read. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{#if }} We are a small, independent magazine, and our subscribers ensure that our journalists have the resources they need to correct misinformation and expose the right’s assaults on our democracy. Will you support their reporting by subscribing today? | {{/if}} |
|
|
|
|
|