Better economic data on LGBTQ+ individuals, developments in the Russia-Ukraine war, and the American Data Privacy and Protection Act.
View in browser
Brookings Brief

July 11, 2023

A smartphone screen shows ChatGPTs examples, capabilities, and limitations
How privacy legislation can help address AI
 

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has been accompanied by a flurry of activity from U.S. policymakers eager to show they’re on top of the issue. Regulating AI will be a challenge, but policymakers don’t need to start from scratch. The American Data Privacy and Protection Act is a useful starting point to address AI issues concerning personal information and civil rights in the digital sphere, Cameron Kerry argues.

Read more
Ukrainian President Zelensky and Polish President Duda attend a religion service to commemorate the victims of the Volyn massacre
What 12 charts reveal about the stalemate in Ukraine
 

“As NATO prepares for its July 11-12 summit in Lithuania, member states are divided over Ukraine’s plea to join the alliance, and over what security guarantees to offer should there be no consensus on membership. Much hinges on how the war proceeds over the next few weeks.” Michael O’Hanlon, Constanze Stelzenmüller, and David Wessel outline crucial data about developments in the Russia-Ukraine war.

Read in The Washington Post
Person with pride wristbands hold up pride flags
The need for better economic data on LGBTQ+ individuals
 

Last month, Brookings hosted an event around the socioeconomic well-being of the LGBTQ+ community and gaps in data collection on sexual orientation and gender identity information within federal economic surveys. Beyond Deng and Elizabeth Link offer key takeaways from the discussion.

Read more
 
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
Brookings

The Brookings Institution,1775 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036

Unsubscribe | Manage newsletter subscriptions 

The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars.